Started By
Message

re: The Playoffs have their first redeeming moment - Oregon wouldn't have been in

Posted on 1/1/15 at 8:21 pm to
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

So? Isn't the point TCU had a legit argument they should have been in instead? So the controversy isn't resolved.
No. The point of the OP is it allowed Oregon in, which they would not have been under BCS.

TCU didn't make this playoff and would have been ranked #5 if BCS was in existence.

#3 Oregon (BCS) getting in is a validation of the playoffs. The #5 (BCS) #6 (playoffs) team getting shut out is moot as they would have been shut out under any scenario.
This post was edited on 1/1/15 at 8:24 pm
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11266 posts
Posted on 1/1/15 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

No. The point of the OP is it allowed Oregon in, which they would not have been under BCS. TCU didn't make this playoff and would have been ranked #5 if BCS was in existence. #3 Oregon (BCS) getting in is a validation of the playoffs. The #5 (BCS) #6 (playoffs) team getting shut out is moot as they would have been shut out under any scenario. This post was edited on 1/1 at 8:24 pm


No the point is the new system hasn't ended the controversy. It put OSU in instead of TCU. And we can see how that's turning out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram