- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:28 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Those are opinion pieces.
There was only one article.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:49 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Name me one tech company that uses quotas
Wow. You are really more dense than I imagined. Let me use smaller words. Feel free to use your finger and read very slowly. QUOTAS are suggested by the MEDIA. Not the TECH companies. Quotas are the opposite of a meritocracy. The Tech companies do not use quotas and do not want aff action.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:50 pm to mahdragonz
Are you trying to be this dense? USA Today is a part of the main stream media and the OP is pointing out that USA Today(and others in the MSM) is constantly writing articles critical of the hiring practices of the tech industry.
If you still fail to understand what is being discussed, please abandon the thread.
If you still fail to understand what is being discussed, please abandon the thread.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:50 pm to Zach
Show me one article that calls for quotas.
You are full of shite and making up this "war."
You are full of shite and making up this "war."
This post was edited on 12/28/14 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:51 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Those are opinion pieces.
That's what a CRUSADE means.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:54 pm to mahdragonz
They want the makeup of tech companies work force to look like the population as a whole, but that isn't possible. Ex.: while African Americans may make up 12% of the population they may only make up 2% of those qualified to work for the likes of Google or Apple.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:56 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Show me one article that calls for quotas.
1. Liberals don't use the word 'quotas'. They use the term 'targets'. This has been true since the 70s when 'quotas' became unpopular.
2. I read NYT and USA in print form at Starbucks so I can't link.
3. I would do a search to link some of them but there is one problem....You're a dickhead and I don't give a shite what you think.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:57 pm to Beerinthepocket
quote:
They want the makeup of tech companies work force to look like the population as a whole, but that isn't possible. Ex.: while African Americans may make up 12% of the population they may only make up 2% of those qualified to work for the likes of Google or Apple.
Who?
Show me one tech executive or hr or somebody who stated this?
This is some fruity fantasy going on here. This is like arguing with liberals. It's all made up!
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:59 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
3. I would do a search to link some of them but there is one problem....You're a dickhead and I don't give a shite what you think.
Because you can't provide evidence for your tantrum?
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:00 pm to mahdragonz
Dude... No one is saying that tech executives are sayin this. The MEDIA is, numbskulls that work for USA Today and the New York Times.
Please invest some time into bettering your reading
comprehension.
Edit: it seems like you are on our same side of the issue, but you fail to realize it.
Please invest some time into bettering your reading
comprehension.
Edit: it seems like you are on our same side of the issue, but you fail to realize it.
This post was edited on 12/28/14 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:03 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
Who?
THE MEDIA!!!! Why do you keep confusing the two sides in the debate?
One side is MSM.
The opposite side is the TECH industry.
Are you mentally retarded?
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:04 pm to Zach
i think he's engaging in some of that modern/progressive debating style
i'm waiting for the spoken-word poetry
i'm waiting for the spoken-word poetry
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:05 pm to Beerinthepocket
That's the thing. The nyt isn't saying it - there are opinion pieces but they publish a wide range of conservative and liberal positions. The article linked isn't saying it.
USA today isn't mainstream media except for dummies.
So the whole op is just making it up for some fake outrage about a thing that doesn't exist except in his head.
USA today isn't mainstream media except for dummies.
So the whole op is just making it up for some fake outrage about a thing that doesn't exist except in his head.
This post was edited on 12/28/14 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:06 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
there are opinion pieces but they publish a wide range of conservative and liberal positions
on this issue?
by the way, you implied earlier they didn't say this at all...now you're saying that it's not that much AND there are counterpoints
can you link those counterpoints?
quote:
USA today isn't mainstream media except for dummies.
a qualification and an argument based in self-perceived elitism. amazing
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:07 pm to mahdragonz
Here's something shiny for you to look at:
Isn't it pretty?
Isn't it pretty?
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Not reading USA today is elitism?
Wow.
Ok.
Different strokes dude. You're right.
Wow.
Ok.
Different strokes dude. You're right.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:11 pm to mahdragonz
I don't read USA Today regularly either, that does not mean it's not part of the MSM.
Saying that it is not part of the MSM because you don't read it is, in fact, elitism.
Saying that it is not part of the MSM because you don't read it is, in fact, elitism.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 1:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i'm waiting for the spoken-word poetry
Not enough women
At Microsoft or Google
Just beta boy nerds
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News