Started By
Message

re: Sad state of affairs for leftists

Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Milennials are pussies, all generations have different difficulties, suck it up and watch Band of Brothers.


Point noted. I'll tell my friends in Greece to mention that when the country defaults on its sovereign debt. Who knew it was so simple?
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55358 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:20 pm to
Sad thing for leftists: Guy we supported for President sold us out as he moved to the right. No gun control, no Universal Health Care. Bigger income gulf than ever. The President put more Wall Street foxes in charge of the hen house.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:33 pm to
You didn't even mention his largest failure, in my opinion, which was his selling the country a bill of goods in the form of the stimulus bill. If allocated correctly, it could have resulted in some of the largest capital deepening this country has ever seen. Instead , only 12% or so went to actual infrastructure investment, with much of the remainder being used for political purposes. The bad thing for him was that if that unprecedented spending ability was used correctly, it very well could have cemented a very favorable legacy for him had it resulted in substantially higher GDP growth (which is certainly possible).

But missed opportunities are what you get when people who don't understand basic economics vote for the media's feel-good candidate with no substantial qualifications (especially relative to modern presidential history).
Posted by Bayou Sam
Istanbul
Member since Aug 2009
5921 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Liberalism doesn't argue. It emotes. Occasionally some Leftist wanker somewhere will attempt to make a weak argument. But Liberalism is intellectually spent and it realizes it. So it doesn't even bother to make a semi-honest argument anymore. It just emotes. Sometimes angrily. Sometime derisively. Sometime condescendingly. But NEVER honestly.


Ah, certainly, Philosopher. The Conservative does not emote. The Conservative has no sentimental attachments to words, and neither passions nor fears drive his Politics. He is only loyal to Reason, compounded with a high Morality. Surely one never sees, indeed, emoting on this board dominated by the Conservative.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
79295 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 1:51 pm to
So we agree. Great news.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

FDR


Closest thing to a tyrant emperor the country has ever seen.

WW2 saved him by getting the economy going.
This post was edited on 12/27/14 at 2:01 pm
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Sad state of affairs for leftists


quote:

crappy trolls


I feel bad for you because it really does seem like you're really looking for a board that fosters open debate and not an echo chamber.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Milennials are pussies, all generations have different difficulties, suck it up and watch Band of Brothers.


WW2 generation didn't have to deal with previous generations using the government to steal from them.

Meanwhile the people in DC who cause these problems stand off to the side and point fingers while we argue with each other.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Ah, certainly, Philosopher. The Conservative does not emote. The Conservative has no sentimental attachments to words, and neither passions nor fears drive his Politics. He is only loyal to Reason, compounded with a high Morality. Surely one never sees, indeed, emoting on this board dominated by the Conservative.



Definitely not. The calls for liberals that run the gamut from the simple "Don't vote anymore" to the more direct "Burn in hell for all you've done to destroy this country" is certainly not emotion based and I'm offended by the very thought that posts of that nature are implied to be driven by anything other than strict, cold logic.
This post was edited on 12/27/14 at 2:07 pm
Posted by jr33
Member since Jan 2010
1229 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 4:40 pm to
Obamacare alone is enough to destroy the left agenda. It will turn out to be the biggest POS legislation this country has ever seen. We have been lied to from day one about this POS and will eventually go away. The lying agendas these people spew is sickening, ACA, Benghazi, Holder, IRS, Media spying, Fast and furious, all these scandals have serious teeth and if the attorney general was not a crook also anyone of these scandals would be enough to impeach and send people to jail. But we continue to lied to and information withheld which is against the law. Obstruction of justice is a way of life with this administration. Washington DC is a cesspool top to bottom and we the people are the suckers.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile the people in DC who cause these problems stand off to the side and point fingers while we argue with each other.


And people keep on electing them
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

However, he set the stage for the overbearing fattened pig of a federal government that we have today, which would certainly put him in the running for worst president of the 20th century, calling him the best is intellectually dishonest,


^^^^

I am getting hit on all sides about FDR, so let's ask the scholars and historians?

LINK

quote:

Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.
The Age of Roosevelt (three volumes, 1957, 1958, 1960)
American democracy has finally clasped FDR to its bosom. Polls show that Washington, Lincoln, and FDR are regarded beyond dispute as our three greatest Presidents. Newt Gingrich, no stouter-hearted Republican than Newt, rates FDR the greatest 20th-century President. FDR's New Deal is no longer to be condemned as a mortal threat to the American way of life. Instead, as President George W. Bush discovered when he tried to fool around with Social Security, New Deal reforms are generally blessed. And their architect is admired and adored.


quote:

In the Shadow of FDR (1983; 3rd ed., 2001)
My most vivid recollection of the FDR centennial is a celebratory luncheon at the White House. Into the room swept the jaunty President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, his face wreathed in a radiant smile. He spoke with unbridled enthusiasm of what an inspiration Roosevelt had been to him, then asked us to raise our glasses in a toast—to "Happy Days!"

The biggest change over the past 25 years is that the United States will never again have a President in any meaningful way acquainted with FDR. For Reagan, Roosevelt was a palpable presence. He voted for him all four times; listened raptly to his fireside chats; and cited him approvingly in his inaugural address. In contrast, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush were each born a year after Roosevelt died.



Presidential Scholar Survey (Aggregate FDR #2 President)

quote:

General Findings

Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt and George Washington are consistently ranked at the top of the lists. Often ranked just below those Presidents are Thomas Jefferson and Theodore Roosevelt. The remaining places in the top ten are often rounded out by Harry S. Truman, Woodrow Wilson, Dwight D. Eisenhower, James K. Polk, and Andrew Jackson. Presidents such as John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton tend to be rated among the greatest in public opinion polls, but do not always rank as highly among presidential scholars and historians. The bottom ten often includes Andrew Johnson, Franklin Pierce, Warren G. Harding, Millard Fillmore, James Buchanan, Herbert Hoover, Martin Van Buren, Zachary Taylor, John Tyler, and George W. Bush. Because William Henry Harrison (32 days) and James A. Garfield (200 days, incapacitated after 119 days) both died shortly after taking office, they are sometimes omitted from presidential rankings. Zachary Taylor also died after serving as president for only 16 months, but is usually included. In the case of these three, it is not clear if they received low rankings due to their actions as president, or because each was president for such a limited time that it is not possible to assess them more thoroughly.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 5:51 pm to
Polling Data of Social Securities Popularity

Polling suggest changes need to be made. A recalibration is needed because of life expectancy and also a sliding scale on income.

LINK

quote:

About 22 million women aged 65 and older receive Social Security benefits. A woman who reaches age 65 can expect to live an additional 20 years. For these women, Social Security represents a vitally important source of income, and is often their only available hedge against inflation. Without Social Security, over half of these women would be living in poverty. Even with Social Security, 11 percent of older women still live in poverty; for widows, the rate is worse, at 15 percent. This is 50 percent higher than the poverty rate for all people 65 and older.


Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Closest thing to a tyrant emperor the country has ever seen.

WW2 saved him by getting the economy going.


Funny how Lincoln is portrayed the same way?

The 2 presidents that did what was necessary to keep the country intact. Let's see how the people viewed FDR?

1932 Electorial Map



1936 Electorial Map


Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 6:09 pm to
Dont bother linking a great historian, Arthur Sclesinger is way above this fray.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 7:08 pm to
Just because people like it doesn't mean anything. Heroin addicts love heroin, until they run out and have to come down.

Social security is just that, economic heroin. At first people could see it for what it was, but as the decades wore on, the people grew a tolerance for it. Now, unfortunately, many dim witted 20 and 30 somethings are saving only pittance, with the foolish belief that the system they paid into will be there to support them in the way it. Is promised. It won't. That is not a political statement, it is math. The left and the right have different inputs that change when we will go bankrupt, but neither deny that we will.

In reply to the band of brothers comment, that generation was lucky because it could point a gun at their enemy. Our enemy is internal. It's like comparing getting attacked by a dog to being diagnosed with cancer.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 7:11 pm to
quote:


I feel bad for you because it really does seem like you're really looking for a board that fosters open debate and not an echo chamber.


I truly do. Their are several good liberal leaning posters here that I enjoy hearing from. In real life, I enjoy pleasant discourse with my liberal friends and often agree with them, but usually with caveat.

In my normal life I am more disappointed in hard core republicans, as they usually don't even know who they are or what they claim to be. Liberals, at a minimum, are accurate in their self labeling.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 7:37 pm to
Social Security will need to be reformed but it won't end. I've already conceded that fact in an earlier post. But, let's stick to your narrative which is that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid should be abolished along with probably welfare as we know it?

I am going to give a cynical view on these social programs. In every civilization the poor threaten the rich or those who have a better means of life. The poor uprise, steal and kill to send a message of anarchy to the powers that be. In every civilization a certain level of handouts must be given so that society, economies etc. can function in a predictable pattern. Imagine the 1930's with half the nation out of work? Only the government had the ability to leverage the country out of a living and breathing hell that was the United States. Programs were created the FDIC, CWA (infrastructure projects), NIRA (minimum wage), Fair Labor Act (protecting kids), stopped Proibition and enacted the SEC.

Social Security today is not what he intended it to be. Other presidents and congress grew the program. FDR believed every man should "strap on their boots and go to work". FDR didn't even want the program the way it was written. Take a look at the way FDR wanted SS to be written and how it was changed.

You claim he is the worst president of the 20th century. Yea, the man got this country out the Great Depression and took us into WWII. The 2 greatest threats this country faced in the 20th century (excluding nuclear war).

LINK
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Dont bother linking a great historian, Arthur Sclesinger is way above this fray.


Well they ask for an intellectual debate and here is one right in front of them.

FDR is historically ranked in top 3 presidents according to 15 various surveys amongst scholars and historians but he is the "the worst ever" on TD. It's this type of crap that makes it hard to even debate on this board. I mean, frick facts, and credible sources etc..
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
79295 posts
Posted on 12/27/14 at 7:56 pm to
In May 1939, U.S. unemployment still exceeded 20%.

FDR was a mixed bag. He was a good war leader but he was also philosophically a not-so-distant cousin to the Fascists of his day. He raised taxes to confiscatory levels pre-war, greatly retarding economic activity and prolonging a terrible recession. His excise taxes KILLED people with limited budgets, and consumers were as cash-poor as any time in modern American history.He placed layer after layer of regulations and laws on American businesses that absolutely destroyed job creation. World War II bailed him out.

He prosecuted the war like a BOSS.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram