- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/18/14 at 10:38 am to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
I'll bet you can't answer one simple question. Was Duke Lacross a case of legitimate rape?
Of course not. It was a crock of bullshite. So was Tawana Bradley. That doesn't excuse you for casting doubt on thousands of women who have been 'legitimately' raped.
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:12 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
I'll bet you can't answer one simple question. Was Duke Lacross a case of legitimate rape?
It was a false accusation. There was nothing but malicious intent behind it, and the person who made that accusation should have been thrown in jail. That being said, I highly doubt most cases are like that.
Just because it doesn't clear reasonable doubt doesn't mean it shouldn't be brought to trial.
If a guy pumps drinks into a girl without drinking himself or puts drugs in her system just to have sex with her, that is rape.
The issue that has always worried me is the drinking/drug/sex party scenario. If a woman makes the decision to have sex with someone, I think it is wrong to backtrack and claim rape. That being said, drugs and alcohol lower inhibitions for both parties. Unfortunately, it can easily turn into a he said she said, and I don't know any real way to deal with that other than fall back on the burden of proof being without a reasonable doubt.
This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 1:15 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News