Call me crazy, but I like Foster more than Muschamp. I think he is really solid. He gets the most out of his players. A&M needs a quick turnaround, and I think Foster would be perfect.

4 ...

Report Post

Posted by texasaggie08

Triple D, TX

Member since Dec 2010

1408 posts

Posted on 12/9/14 at 3:33 pm to SwaggerCopter

Its close for me

To the USC fan, several programs have tried to get Foster and haven't, so IF we do, I'd argue that it was a bigger task to pull off than landing Muschamp. Although I fully believe Muschamp still is/was our #1 target.

Foster is arguably as good or better though, for different reasons.

This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 3:34 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by cardboardboxer

Member since Apr 2012

34348 posts

Posted on 12/9/14 at 3:46 pm to SwaggerCopter

quote:
Call me crazy, but I like Foster more than Muschamp.

Me too.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by chRxis

None of your fricking business

Member since Feb 2008

23769 posts

Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:21 pm to SwaggerCopter

quote:
Call me crazy, but I like Foster more than Muschamp

Crazy

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TheCaterpillar

Member since Jan 2004

76774 posts

Posted on 12/10/14 at 9:10 am to SwaggerCopter

quote:
Call me crazy, but I like Foster more than Muschamp.

That's not crazy in the least.

Foster is 10x the D coordinator Muschamp is.

Muschamp is 10x the recruiter though. A&M doesn't really need a recruiter, but USCe could use it.

ETA:
To expound, Bud does more with less. Muschamp has always had wayyy more talent than Bud. Give Bud Foster 5* talent all over his defense and you’d see something pretty special I think. Boom has not proven to be as consistent as Bud either.

This post was edited on 12/10/14 at 9:14 am

1 ...

Report Post

Coaching Changes - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board