Started By
Message

re: If the warming has stopped how come October was the warmest on record?

Posted on 11/27/14 at 11:00 am to
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
82280 posts
Posted on 11/27/14 at 11:00 am to
Tuba, my family of grateful Earth-Mother dwellers have gathered outdoors in a cypress grove on a Thanksgiving day of Sun and Clouds to contemplate what is being lost and how much we can still save. I pray agnostically that we are not too late and that the damage to Earth Mother caused by our slavish devotion to suicidal fossil fuels will be overcome by meaningful Earth-saving State dictate.

Earth-Mother vibes of harmonic convergence be with you...
This post was edited on 11/27/14 at 11:11 am
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 11/27/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

So it takes those greenhouse gases a while to warm up, eh?


You are a fricking idiot plz refrain from responding to my post, thank you.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
126479 posts
Posted on 11/27/14 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

You are a fricking idiot plz refrain from responding to my post, thank you.
Happy Thanksgiving to you too.

You've already intimated volcanic production as contributory to regular q 0.11Ma cyclical CO2 upticks. Kind of silly.

Now you're discussing lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing which is a hapless thesis developed to explain differentials between predictive modeling vs actual findings. Kind of silly too.

Probably best you stick with the name calling.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 11/27/14 at 2:52 pm to
happy thanksgiving to you too

you entire schtick of posting on this site is obtuse, vague, verbose, rhetorical passive aggressive bullshite, it gets tiresome wading thru your juvenile responses.

throughout climate history natural initial warming is just about always followed by a rise in C02 followed by the lag response which consists of warming due to well understood positive feedback loops

againg the trend is upward for both co2 and temperature we just have not seen the full effect of 400ppm and we probably wont for about 10-30 years, but its coming, you can bank on that
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
126479 posts
Posted on 11/27/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

throughout climate history natural initial warming is just about always followed by a rise in C02
Correct.
Not trying to be obtuse, vague, verbose, rhetorical, passive aggressive, or tiresome, but you assert CO2 causes global warming.

So, following your posit to its logical end, what then causes global cooling in the face of rising CO2?
quote:

the trend is upward for both co2 and temperature
So there is/was no warming "pause"? Because such a pause, in light of steadily increasing CO2 levels, would be hard to explain.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36132 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:13 am to
quote:

....can you say both houses....and the Oval Office .....so long libbies!!!!
Sorry, but there aren't enough white people to get a Republican elected to the White House.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36132 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:14 am to
quote:

Tuba, my family of grateful Earth-Mother dwellers have gathered outdoors in a cypress grove on a Thanksgiving day of Sun and Clouds to contemplate what is being lost and how much we can still save. I pray agnostically that we are not too late and that the damage to Earth Mother caused by our slavish devotion to suicidal fossil fuels will be overcome by meaningful Earth-saving State dictate.

Earth-Mother vibes of harmonic convergence be with you...


I'm not worried about saving Earth. Earth will be here long after we are gone. Its the humans we should worry about.
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
9469 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:44 am to
Strange that a person with such a giant carbon footprint would be so concerned with global warming. Why not do your part and lose 200 pounds. Do you not realize how much of the world's resources go into you maintaining your 500 lb frame?
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36132 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Strange that a person with such a giant carbon footprint would be so concerned with global warming. Why not do your part and lose 200 pounds. Do you not realize how much of the world's resources go into you maintaining your 500 lb frame?

ad hominem ad nauseam
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
106297 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Same as those that deny the science and cheer on cool weather


Let me know when you warm monger's actually get any that aren't doctored up and skew the real data.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
72277 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

bro, do you global?



Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Now you're discussing lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing
There are lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing. Ocean heat uptake takes centuries. That's why transient climate sensitivity and equilibrium climate sensitivity are two different values.
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:38 am
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18626 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Earth will be here long after we are gone. Its the humans we should worry about.


From everything I've seen, you libs seem a lot more concerned about snail darters and field mice than humans.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
126479 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

There are lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing. Ocean heat uptake takes centuries
In that context, ocean heat uptake would of course release oceanic CO2 into the atmosphere. Increased atmospheric CO2 would tend to counter any lag.

But at least you're willing to acknowledge erroneous nature of warmist modeling as it predicts disastrous imminent climate impact.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
58701 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

There are lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing. Ocean heat uptake takes centuries.
Yet... monthy temperature data demonstrates "the warming"...
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36132 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:50 pm to
quote:


From everything I've seen, you libs seem a lot more concerned about snail darters and field mice than humans.



The first clause in your sentence is a lie.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36132 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

Yet... monthy temperature data demonstrates "the warming"...


Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
58701 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Ocean heat uptake takes centuries
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 8:08 pm
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:16 pm to
I thought about posting an explanation here, but what would be the point? I'd just be paraphrasing something explained quite clearly in the IPCC in my own words and with no citation (or a direct citation to the papers used in the IPCC) to avoid the automatic "HURRR IPCC" response. And between you, Tuba, and NC, there's maybe one person who could, with honest effort, understand the science.

(Sorry, Tuba, it's not you. frick along, now.)
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:18 pm
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36132 posts
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:20 pm to
U so smart iosh.

I have no idea why you hate me though. Best I can figure is before my reinstatement you were the only nondenialist in a sea of denialism and now you can't stand the competition.
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram