- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If the warming has stopped how come October was the warmest on record?
Posted on 11/27/14 at 11:00 am to SpidermanTUba
Posted on 11/27/14 at 11:00 am to SpidermanTUba
Tuba, my family of grateful Earth-Mother dwellers have gathered outdoors in a cypress grove on a Thanksgiving day of Sun and Clouds to contemplate what is being lost and how much we can still save. I pray agnostically that we are not too late and that the damage to Earth Mother caused by our slavish devotion to suicidal fossil fuels will be overcome by meaningful Earth-saving State dictate.
Earth-Mother vibes of harmonic convergence be with you...
Earth-Mother vibes of harmonic convergence be with you...
This post was edited on 11/27/14 at 11:11 am
Posted on 11/27/14 at 11:55 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
So it takes those greenhouse gases a while to warm up, eh?
You are a fricking idiot plz refrain from responding to my post, thank you.
Posted on 11/27/14 at 2:07 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:Happy Thanksgiving to you too.
You are a fricking idiot plz refrain from responding to my post, thank you.
You've already intimated volcanic production as contributory to regular q 0.11Ma cyclical CO2 upticks. Kind of silly.
Now you're discussing lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing which is a hapless thesis developed to explain differentials between predictive modeling vs actual findings. Kind of silly too.
Probably best you stick with the name calling.
Posted on 11/27/14 at 2:52 pm to NC_Tigah
happy thanksgiving to you too
you entire schtick of posting on this site is obtuse, vague, verbose, rhetorical passive aggressive bullshite, it gets tiresome wading thru your juvenile responses.
throughout climate history natural initial warming is just about always followed by a rise in C02 followed by the lag response which consists of warming due to well understood positive feedback loops
againg the trend is upward for both co2 and temperature we just have not seen the full effect of 400ppm and we probably wont for about 10-30 years, but its coming, you can bank on that
you entire schtick of posting on this site is obtuse, vague, verbose, rhetorical passive aggressive bullshite, it gets tiresome wading thru your juvenile responses.
throughout climate history natural initial warming is just about always followed by a rise in C02 followed by the lag response which consists of warming due to well understood positive feedback loops
againg the trend is upward for both co2 and temperature we just have not seen the full effect of 400ppm and we probably wont for about 10-30 years, but its coming, you can bank on that
Posted on 11/27/14 at 3:12 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:Correct.
throughout climate history natural initial warming is just about always followed by a rise in C02
Not trying to be obtuse, vague, verbose, rhetorical, passive aggressive, or tiresome, but you assert CO2 causes global warming.
So, following your posit to its logical end, what then causes global cooling in the face of rising CO2?
quote:So there is/was no warming "pause"? Because such a pause, in light of steadily increasing CO2 levels, would be hard to explain.
the trend is upward for both co2 and temperature
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:13 am to Jim Ignatowski
quote:Sorry, but there aren't enough white people to get a Republican elected to the White House.
....can you say both houses....and the Oval Office .....so long libbies!!!!
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:14 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Tuba, my family of grateful Earth-Mother dwellers have gathered outdoors in a cypress grove on a Thanksgiving day of Sun and Clouds to contemplate what is being lost and how much we can still save. I pray agnostically that we are not too late and that the damage to Earth Mother caused by our slavish devotion to suicidal fossil fuels will be overcome by meaningful Earth-saving State dictate.
Earth-Mother vibes of harmonic convergence be with you...
I'm not worried about saving Earth. Earth will be here long after we are gone. Its the humans we should worry about.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:44 am to SpidermanTUba
Strange that a person with such a giant carbon footprint would be so concerned with global warming. Why not do your part and lose 200 pounds. Do you not realize how much of the world's resources go into you maintaining your 500 lb frame?
Posted on 11/29/14 at 9:23 am to ClientNumber9
quote:
Strange that a person with such a giant carbon footprint would be so concerned with global warming. Why not do your part and lose 200 pounds. Do you not realize how much of the world's resources go into you maintaining your 500 lb frame?
ad hominem ad nauseam
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:11 am to MJM
quote:
Same as those that deny the science and cheer on cool weather
Let me know when you warm monger's actually get any that aren't doctored up and skew the real data.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:36 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
bro, do you global?
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:37 am to NC_Tigah
quote:There are lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing. Ocean heat uptake takes centuries. That's why transient climate sensitivity and equilibrium climate sensitivity are two different values.
Now you're discussing lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:38 am
Posted on 11/29/14 at 11:19 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Earth will be here long after we are gone. Its the humans we should worry about.
From everything I've seen, you libs seem a lot more concerned about snail darters and field mice than humans.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 12:33 pm to Iosh
quote:In that context, ocean heat uptake would of course release oceanic CO2 into the atmosphere. Increased atmospheric CO2 would tend to counter any lag.
There are lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing. Ocean heat uptake takes centuries
But at least you're willing to acknowledge erroneous nature of warmist modeling as it predicts disastrous imminent climate impact.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 1:25 pm to Iosh
quote:Yet... monthy temperature data demonstrates "the warming"...
There are lags in heat generated from CO2 forcing. Ocean heat uptake takes centuries.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:50 pm to HonoraryCoonass
quote:
From everything I've seen, you libs seem a lot more concerned about snail darters and field mice than humans.
The first clause in your sentence is a lie.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 7:50 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Yet... monthy temperature data demonstrates "the warming"...
Posted on 11/29/14 at 8:05 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
Ocean heat uptake takes centuries
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:16 pm to Taxing Authority
I thought about posting an explanation here, but what would be the point? I'd just be paraphrasing something explained quite clearly in the IPCC in my own words and with no citation (or a direct citation to the papers used in the IPCC) to avoid the automatic "HURRR IPCC" response. And between you, Tuba, and NC, there's maybe one person who could, with honest effort, understand the science.
(Sorry, Tuba, it's not you. frick along, now.)
(Sorry, Tuba, it's not you. frick along, now.)
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:20 pm to Iosh
U so smart iosh.
I have no idea why you hate me though. Best I can figure is before my reinstatement you were the only nondenialist in a sea of denialism and now you can't stand the competition.
I have no idea why you hate me though. Best I can figure is before my reinstatement you were the only nondenialist in a sea of denialism and now you can't stand the competition.
This post was edited on 11/29/14 at 10:41 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News