- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bombshell: Email proves Obama/Holder targeted Sharyl Attkisson
Posted on 11/21/14 at 7:39 am to Da Sheik
Posted on 11/21/14 at 7:39 am to Da Sheik
And the media will still continue to suck Obama's dick...
First they came for the right wing media, but who gives a frick about those Tea Party assholes...
First they came for the right wing media, but who gives a frick about those Tea Party assholes...
This post was edited on 11/21/14 at 7:41 am
Posted on 11/21/14 at 7:44 am to mmcgrath
quote:
mmcgrath
Your ilk are the ones who ran Nixon out of town on a rail.
This guy makes Nixon look like an amateur, yet you'll defend him to the death.
The hypocrisy from the ends-justify-the-means types is staggering. But that's ok. What goes around, comes around.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 7:45 am to Godfather1
boot lickers gonna lick boots
Posted on 11/21/14 at 7:59 am to Godfather1
quote:
The hypocrisy from the ends-justify-the-means types is staggering. But that's ok. What goes around, comes around.
MmcGrath and I realize something you don't. A society ain't gonna fundamentally transform itself. It takes action. Dissenters must be crushed or our Noble Endeavor could be at risk. And lol about you thinking this will "come around"...*guffaws loudly. Why the hell do you think we run the Media Apparatus in the first place ? They immunize us from scrutiny. We have them in our hip pocket precisely because we don't want this to "come back around". And anyhow, you Constitutional Martyrs are slaves to The Rule Of Law anyway. Your disposition won't allow you to take the steps we take on a daily basis. That's our inherent advantage. You restrain yourself. Fundamental Transformation is too BIG to restrain. We fight with knives while you wankers hold your breath really hard and hope we stop.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:02 am to mmcgrath
quote:
mmcgrath
IRS targeting conservative groups...yeah that happened
Fast and Furious coverup...yeah that happened
Benghazi coverup...yeah that happened
Lies about ACA to get it passed...yeah that happened
Fox News Reporter targeted by DOJ...yeah that happened
Attkisson harassed after unflattering story about admin...that would never happen, she is a lying conspiracy nut..
This post was edited on 11/21/14 at 8:03 am
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:20 am to Godfather1
quote:You would have let Nixon continue?
Your ilk are the ones who ran Nixon out of town on a rail.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:25 am to Da Sheik
And from this day forward 80% of poliboard posters will think this story is true and the media is protecting Obama.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:28 am to Rickety Cricket
quote:
2. The base will not believe the report.
The irony of course is that this type of story is designed specifically for meat-head conservatives.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:28 am to bamafan1001
quote:Lerner did
IRS targeting conservative groups...yeah that happened
quote:I don't think you know what that word means.
Fast and Furious coverup...yeah that happened
Benghazi coverup...yeah that happened
quote:So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
Lies about ACA to get it passed...yeah that happened
quote:The US govt can't track / prosecute leaks?
Fox News Reporter targeted by DOJ...yeah that happened
quote:She is. Watch the video.
Attkisson harassed after unflattering story about admin...that would never happen, she is a lying conspiracy nut..
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:32 am to mmcgrath
quote:
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA.
Did you know, in order to be compliant with Obamacare, my company had to change healthcare plans for all employees. I am not covered for maternity care. I am a 32 year old male.
As a result of paying higher deductibles, I must now pay out of pocket, for short term disability insurance. Something that was previously in my plan, that i now must pay out of pocket.
In summation, Rex, you are an idiot.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:33 am to a want
quote:
And from this day forward 80% of poliboard posters will think this story is true and the media is protecting Obama.
Anyone with a brain and a pair of eyed did not need any more evidence to know that the media is/has been/will be covering for the Obama administration.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:34 am to mmcgrath
quote:
You would have let Nixon continue?
No. I don't condone corruption.
And therein lies the difference between you and I.
This post was edited on 11/21/14 at 8:36 am
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:34 am to mmcgrath
quote:
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
You stupid mother fricker
High deductible catastrophic plans make the most sense for someone who can self-insure for the trivial shite.
fricking dipshits don't understand money and they force their stupidity on everyone else
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:35 am to a want
quote:
And from this day forward 80% of poliboard posters will think this story is true
Please tell us that part of the emails are true and what part is a lie...
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:36 am to Da Sheik
Pretty damning; however, misleading thread title is misleading.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:40 am to Godfather1
quote:
No. And therein lies the difference between you and I.
Which is why we Fundamentalist Transformers can never lose . It's freaking BEAUTIFUL! We get to redefine SITUATIONAL ETHICS on a daily basis and you good-government rubes have a self-defeating intellectual-honesty mechanism built-in. You can't defeat us, but you will assist us in defeating you every single time. It's absolutely brilliant. You are SLAVES to The Rule Of Law, we just point at it and laugh.
Forward has never been so easy ....
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:47 am to BugAC
quote:One of the biggest brain dead complaints. I presume you meant that you are covered. But do you know how much that would add to your premium being a male and all?
I am not covered for maternity care. I am a 32 year old male.
quote:So that coverage was taken out of your plan? Sorry. Has nothing to do with the ACA though. In NJ the short term disability payments are very good in the state program. It appears Louisiana only covers for pregnancy related disability.
As a result of paying higher deductibles, I must now pay out of pocket, for short term disability insurance. Something that was previously in my plan, that i now must pay out of pocket.
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:47 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Lerner did
And you agree that she was the head of the IRS, appointed by Obama and nothing happened to her as a result of her actions on behalf of the President, correct?
What inferences can we draw then? Either, A. The President directed her actions, or B. The President approves of her actions and would continue to, but for the political fallout from the exposure.
That's awfully flimsy ground on which to be standing on this issue.
quote:
So you don't get to keep crappy plans that don't meet the requirements of the ACA. Sorry.
Which is fine if the law had been sold that way, honestly. They had to Gruber people to pass the bill. You don't see the inherent problem that people have with that?
quote:
The US govt can't track / prosecute leaks?
And I assume you take that position with regards to Nixon's actions following the Watergate break-in?
Also done by others with the President having plausible deniability... (Colson did it. Liddy did it, etc.)
quote:
I don't think you know what that word means.
We know what it means.
I see the quandry this guy has put y'all in - you seem intellectually honest and engaging at times - but defending the indefensible costs you credibility. You want to say Attkisson is crazy and that may be right. But she was targeted by these people to keep her from investigating them.
Of that I have little doubt. Now, what happens when a crazy person is really being targeted? Their paranoia amps up big time. But it does not make them magically "untargeted", now does it?
Posted on 11/21/14 at 8:49 am to Godfather1
quote:Yet you said I would have ran him out of town as well.quote:No. I don't condone corruption.
You would have let Nixon continue?
And therein lies the difference between you and I.
So let me recap:
I am the type of "ilk" that ran Nixon out of office.
You would have done the same thing.
"therein lies the difference between you and I"
But luspimp agrees. So it's like
This post was edited on 11/21/14 at 8:51 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News