- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: you dont need a gimmick to cook a steak
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:45 am to dnm3305
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:45 am to dnm3305
quote:
They both achieve medium rare and a good crust.
One achieves a higher percentage of medium rare, the other contains much more gray.
quote:
One takes 10-15 mins, the other takes over an hr. Some people dont have time to bullshite around for over an hr to get the same results.
The actual time of active cooking is actually probably less for a reverse sear, and you get better, more consistent results with less attention paid.
I "reverse seared" a prime rib for Christmas Dinner last year, and this is what came out:
It was amazing.
I think the two errors people make with the reverse sear, is getting to thin of a steak (also a problem with the high and fast method) and they also roast the meat at too high of a temperature which creates more gray and eliminates the benefit of the reverse sear and they don't think it's worth it.
Sous vide-reverse seared steaks are probably the best cooked steak you can do IMO.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:52 am to KosmoCramer
All the food in that pic looks kind of gross.
Posted on 11/18/14 at 11:24 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
One achieves a higher percentage of medium rare, the other contains much more gray.
Yea. That's called rare.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News