Started By
Message

re: you dont need a gimmick to cook a steak

Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:33 am to
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13637 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:33 am to
quote:

If you put two identical steaks side by side, one reverse seared and the other seared and finished off in the oven, most people would prefer the RS



It's the same damn thing. They both achieve medium rare and a good crust. One takes 10-15 mins, the other takes over an hr. Some people dont have time to bullshite around for over an hr to get the same results.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76582 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:45 am to
quote:

They both achieve medium rare and a good crust.



One achieves a higher percentage of medium rare, the other contains much more gray.



quote:

One takes 10-15 mins, the other takes over an hr. Some people dont have time to bullshite around for over an hr to get the same results.



The actual time of active cooking is actually probably less for a reverse sear, and you get better, more consistent results with less attention paid.



I "reverse seared" a prime rib for Christmas Dinner last year, and this is what came out:



It was amazing.




I think the two errors people make with the reverse sear, is getting to thin of a steak (also a problem with the high and fast method) and they also roast the meat at too high of a temperature which creates more gray and eliminates the benefit of the reverse sear and they don't think it's worth it.

Sous vide-reverse seared steaks are probably the best cooked steak you can do IMO.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram