Started By
Message

re: ObamaCare architect mouths off yet again; cause problems for Dems

Posted on 11/14/14 at 2:16 pm to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96902 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 2:16 pm to
He claims in an amicus brief on the state exchanges that using the term "state exchange" was a typo and that all exchanges get subsidies.

Problem is that we have video saying the opposite.


That is the current case SCOTUS is reviewing and it should make for some interesting questioning.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

He claims in an amicus brief on the state exchanges that using the term "state exchange" was a typo and that all exchanges get subsidies.

Problem is that we have video saying the opposite.


That is the current case SCOTUS is reviewing and it should make for some interesting questioning.

Yes, after I read this, obamacare could be seriously fricked.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25446 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

He claims in an amicus brief on the state exchanges that using the term "state exchange" was a typo and that all exchanges get subsidies.


Can you explain the significance of this?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram