- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ObamaCare architect mouths off yet again; cause problems for Dems
Posted on 11/14/14 at 2:05 pm to teke184
Posted on 11/14/14 at 2:05 pm to teke184
quote:
But this will likely play into the SCOTUS decision on exchanges and other things.
dishonesty in the law making process should not impact the courts one iota.
Even if obama lied, it should have no bearing on the ruling by the courts. otherwise its clear the courts are completely corrupt. They are supposed to be above politics, not knuckle dragging like the rest.
As for gruber, dean probably wants a flux capacitor to go back and shut him up!
4
Posted on 11/14/14 at 2:09 pm to Hawkeye95
It goes beyond "dishonesty in the law".
This asshat has submitted an amicus brief on this case saying the exact opposite of what he has been caught saying on film.
I don't think SCOTUS looks favorably on that kind of thing.
This asshat has submitted an amicus brief on this case saying the exact opposite of what he has been caught saying on film.
I don't think SCOTUS looks favorably on that kind of thing.
Posted on 11/14/14 at 2:56 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:It absolutely should in the pending case. The question is one of intent of the lawmakers. If they are actively being deceptive about their intended purpose of the law... how can one interpret the law accurately?
dishonesty in the law making process should not impact the courts one iota.
Posted on 11/14/14 at 7:47 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
dishonesty in the law making process should not impact the courts one iota.
Even if obama lied, it should have no bearing on the ruling by the courts. otherwise its clear the courts are completely corrupt. They are supposed to be above politics, not knuckle dragging like the rest.
Wait so an author of a bill who painstakingly lays out how every word and phrase was carefully crafted to lock people in and mislead should be of no relevance to a case where these people claim this was a simple 'typo'? Seriously? The Supreme Court no longer has to debate whether there was an intent to exclude citizens of states with no exchange - the dude laid it out for the world to hear and the 'political ramifications'. That is done.
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:06 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
Even if obama lied, it should have no bearing on the ruling by the courts. otherwise its clear the courts are completely corrupt. They are supposed to be above politics, not knuckle dragging like the rest.
In most appellate cases, courts generally only consider stuff on the record, i.e., that was introduced in the lower court.
But, the Supreme Court is a different animal entirely and can take Judicial notice of such things if they wish. Basically, the Supreme Court can pretty much do whatever the frick they want to if they have the necessary 4 or five votes depending on the situation.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News