- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 10/27/14 at 11:54 pm to lurk9000
quote:
it was implied that it was required After further review of the contract, it is NOT required - looks like a lot of these folks don't mind being lied to
You don't get it still. If you didn't want the rate and thought the deal wasn't fair, why did you take it?
And, personally, I don't think you find a 79 month loan on a USED car at 3.29% anywhere. So, while it may not be required there's no way they give you that rate if you don't give them more $$ for the warranty.
Posted on 10/28/14 at 9:01 am to lurk9000
quote:
Posted by lurk9000 it was implied that it was required After further review of the contract, it is NOT required - looks like a lot of these folks don't mind being lied to
It's called give and take in negotiations. He was willing to give you a lower rate only if you bought the warranty. That's not lying. That's making a deal. And you suck for making us try to find the scam in your normal negotiation.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News