Started By
Message
locked post

Texas Atty Gen and U of Houston law professor agree: City of Houston overreached

Posted on 10/17/14 at 3:57 pm
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61458 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 3:57 pm
in issuing subpoenas for Houston-area pastor's sermons.

quote:

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott also issued a letter saying the city impinged on the pastors’ First Amendment rights and called for the subpoenas’ immediate reversal. “Whether you intend it to be so or not, your action is a direct assault on the religious liberty guaranteed by the First Amendment,” Abbott wrote to Feldman. “The people of Houston and their religious leaders must be absolutely secure in their knowledge that their religious affairs are beyond the reach of the government.”

LINK
This post was edited on 10/17/14 at 4:43 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111802 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 4:14 pm to
Not true. All the lawyers on here said it was just discovery.

I'm gonna go with the TD lawyers.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79671 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 4:14 pm to
Our very idiotic mayor scaled back the HERO list today/last night. "We would never want this to come across as religious persecution"

She is a twat.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 4:47 pm to
Those poor internet lawyers that thought otherwise.....
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:30 pm to
The pervert should be recalled.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46628 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:37 pm to
The pastors ended up not being involved in the lawsuit, and thus the subpoena was promptly bitch-slapped. That's pretty much what most said would happen.

This ruling isn't saying the subpoena would have been thrown out regardless of the involvement of the pastors and churches in the suit. Had they been, the subpoena would have been perfectly legal. This isn't some unilateral declaration that churches are free from legal precedent like some here were claiming.
This post was edited on 10/17/14 at 5:38 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69494 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 6:09 pm to
Were there actually posters on this board defending Houston? If so, who were the posters?
Posted by LeonPhelps
Member since May 2008
8185 posts
Posted on 10/18/14 at 12:17 am to
So how did a city in the heart of Texas not called Austin end up with a "left-leaning, openly gay mayor"? That is the most confusing part to me. I did not know that was the case before this subpoena ordeal.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54754 posts
Posted on 10/18/14 at 12:28 pm to
Greg Abbott is the political and intellectual equivalent of Revelator and a politician running for office.

The overreach wasn't ssking for the sermons, it was the broadness of the related content...as provided by the non-politician law professor:

quote:

However, Linzer says it wouldn't impinge on the pastors' First Amendment rights if the city only asked only for sermons or speeches related to the signature drive. "Let's assume they gave instructions to cheat," Linzer says. "That would be relevant speech and I don't see how they would have any First Amendment protection for that."


From your link...which was what most of the board lawyers said.

The hysterical morons believe that sermons shouldn't be discoverable period.
This post was edited on 10/18/14 at 12:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram