Started By
Message

re: Would Les have already dismissed Jameis Winston?

Posted on 10/16/14 at 11:41 am to
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
10508 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 11:41 am to
quote:

is is why the NCAA stripped their title. oh wait, no, sorry, i meant to say, "and yet the NCAA didn't do a fricking thing."


Was synthetic weed considered a banned substance in their policy? If not they may have tested for it, but not punished for it.

I am not defending the NCAA, but LSU was technically on probation and thus under higher scrutiny in 2011 and 2012 when Mathieu was kicked off. That is why you saw the admin, and not Les, being harder on things.

If you remember, LSU was on probation for its first major violation in 20+ years.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96839 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Was synthetic weed considered a banned substance in their policy? If not they may have tested for it, but not punished for it.

The article he linked even states they did not put it in their policy until 2011 after they saw all the tests for it. So while they were showing positve for spice, they werent "failing" because it was not banned yet
Posted by jaguar fan
Member since Feb 2014
754 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 12:23 pm to
Hypocritical dumb folk. let me babysit your 14 year daughter lol
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 10/16/14 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Was synthetic weed considered a banned substance in their policy? If not they may have tested for it, but not punished for it.

well, its pretty hard to believe that they had up to 24 players smoking spice... and nothing else. just that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram