Started By
Message

re: Watching JFK: The Smoking Gun

Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:28 am to
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:28 am to
quote:

In over 50 years, not a single credible witness has come forward lending credence to a conspiracy to kill Kennedy. Not one. In the same time, many top secret government operations have all been revealed.


So why did the the House Select Committee find that Kennedy's death was "probably" part of a conspiracy? Obviously, there was enough evidence (even without witnesses) to find it was more probable than not that a conspiracy took place.
This post was edited on 10/15/14 at 8:45 am
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:33 am to
quote:

That is by far the best, and most convincing, documentary/special on the JFK assassination. I don't see how any of their findings can be disputed.


I agree the the documentary was well done, but you can see how their findings could be disputed given that they did not have access to all the information (because no one not in the government does at this time). Also, the House Select Committee came to a different conclusion. So you should be able to see how their finding "could" be disputed even if you disagree. I think reasonable minds can disagree on this issue.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35703 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:43 am to
quote:

In over 50 years, not a single credible witness has come forward lending credence to a conspiracy to kill Kennedy. Not one.
The United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was established in 1976 to investigate the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr.. The Committee completed its investigation in 1978 and issued its final report the following year, concluding that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.

In 1992, Congress passed legislation to collect and open up all the evidence relating to Kennedy's death, and created the Assassination Records Review Board to further that goal. No materials have been uncovered which significantly change the conclusions or opinion of the HSCA.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71690 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:45 am to
It's ok bud.
Posted by dpd901
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
7537 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:50 am to
quote:

So why did the the House Select Committee find that Kennedy's death was "probably" part of a conspiracy? Obviously, there was enough evidence (even without witnesses) to find it was more probably than not that a conspiracy took place.


The House Select Committee originally agreed with the Warren Commission. At the end of the hearings, they were presented with Acoustic evidence regarding a motorcycle officers open Mike supposedly picking up the sound of a fourth shot coming from the area of the grassy knoll. Based completely on that evidence alone, the committee reversed it's findings and concluded that the assassination was likely the result of a conspiracy. This evidence was contingent on the officer being in a precise location at the time of the shot. In the years since, it has been conclusively proven that the officer was not at that spot and in fact wasn't even in Dealy plaza at the time.
Posted by dpd901
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
7537 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:53 am to
quote:

In 1992, Congress passed legislation to collect and open up all the evidence relating to Kennedy's death, and created the Assassination Records Review Board to further that goal. No materials have been uncovered which significantly change the conclusions or opinion of the HSCA.


That's simply not true... Evidence has been uncovered that debunks the basis of the HSCA's conclusion.

The rest of your statement makes zero sense... The HSCA wouldn't have been reconvened to give a new conclusion 15 years later...
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25348 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:54 am to
quote:

The House Select Committee originally agreed with the Warren Commission. At the end of the hearings, they were presented with Acoustic evidence regarding a motorcycle officers open Mike supposedly picking up the sound of a fourth shot coming from the area of the grassy knoll. Based completely on that evidence alone, the committee reversed it's findings and concluded that the assassination was likely the result of a conspiracy. This evidence was contingent on the officer being in a precise location at the time of the shot. In the years since, it has been conclusively proven that the officer was not at that spot and in fact wasn't even in Dealy plaza at the time.


That is not the sole basis for the conclusion that there was a probable conspiracy. What you are saying is partly correct for sure though. The commission suspected two gunmen, but it also indicated it did not know how far the conspiracy went, meaning that Oswald could have acted alone and still received support sufficient to trigger a conspiracy from some other group, the commissions suspicion would be some individuals in organized crime.

Also, the acoustic evidence has not been completely debunked. It has been disputed. Again reasonable minds can disagree, and the original researchers appear to still stand by their analysis.

The real point is that it still could have been a conspiracy with Oswald being the only shooter.
This post was edited on 10/15/14 at 9:09 am
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72683 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 8:54 am to
quote:

The HSCA wouldn't have been reconvened to give a new conclusion 15 years later...


It is the government, of course they would.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

With the objective evidence they present, how could anybody argue against the agent in the trail vehicle shooting Kennedy? Accidentally of course.



A quick Google search would explain to you just how dumb that theory is.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35703 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 9:14 am to
quote:

In 1992, Congress passed legislation to collect and open up all the evidence relating to Kennedy's death, and created the Assassination Records Review Board to further that goal. No materials have been uncovered which significantly change the conclusions or opinion of the HSCA.






That's simply not true... Evidence has been uncovered that debunks the basis of the HSCA's conclusion.

The rest of your statement makes zero sense... The HSCA wouldn't have been reconvened to give a new conclusion 15 years later...
LINK
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51876 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 3:27 pm to
Just watched it. George Hickey did that shite..
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
120019 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 3:43 pm to
I thought it was obvious that the limo driver turned, shot JFK and drove to the hospital. Completely plausible.
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11978 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 9:04 pm to
I don't believe in "magic" bullets or Jack Ruby just being patriotic. Something was afoul. Is it a full blown conspiracy involving the CIA, mafia, and govt? Doubtful. As mentioned, it's awfully hard to keep that many mouths shut. But I wouldn't be surprised if at least one of the above mentioned was part of it as well as Oswald, of course.
Posted by coonass27
shreveport
Member since Mar 2008
3620 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 9:19 pm to
The secret service killed Kennedy. I do believe that there was some sort of plan by powers that be to have him taken out and Oswald was their guy, but as the only thing they proved was that Oswald was a cracked frick up. Don't forget that he killed a cop the same day. The secret service agent in the car behind Kennedy's car shot him with the AR 15 after oswalds shot. Un intentionally of course. The cluster after was a cover up by the people who are supposed to protect the president.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

First it's "Oswald and Ferrie didn't know each other at all." Then when a picture comes out that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that they had to know each other it becomes "show me conclusively when they double dated and watched football games together."


I have dozens of photos where my picture was taken standing with a group in various social and business situations. In most of the photos I have never met, and do not know who many of the other people are, seems like a fairly common occurrence.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram