Started By
Message

re: Dallas Ebola patient to be prosecuted, circle of contact increased to 100

Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:45 am to
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51954 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:45 am to
Nothing in that infrogram is wrong. There are a couple of innacurracies as is typical for large generalizations like that....but they are minor.

And there isn't any indication to suggest that it even *might* be wrong.
This post was edited on 10/3/14 at 11:47 am
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Nothing in that infrogram is wrong


quote:

There are a couple of innacurracies


quote:

And there isn't any indication to suggest that it even *might* be wrong


I understand what you're saying.

But I don't.

But really, I do.

Except where I don't.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124628 posts
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Nothing in that infrogram is wrong.
Technically no, as long as the reader understands that the "contact with blood or body fluids" can occur indirectly 3-4 days later, long after the infected person has departed the area.

I can guarantee the average reader would not gleen that from the infogram.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram