quote:
No you aren't. You are posting on a board that wants validity of the process. PERIOD! You couldn't care less about validity. You are in search of numbers regardless of means of attaining them. Why are you in favor of denying all Americans access to an ID?

Scruffy wants less voters. Many on this board are for less idiots voting. Many are for the vote being tied to prop ownership. I suggest you review that thread and then get back to me.

Please stop with the strawmen.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by NC_Tigah

Carolinas

Member since Sep 2003

124360 posts

Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:07 pm to BuckyBadger

quote:
I suggest you review that thread and then get back to me.

quote:
5276 Total Users Online (756 members plus 4520 lurkers)

You cited 2 or 3 people?

Again, you are posting on a board that wants validity of the process. You don't.

quote:
Please stop with the strawmen.

Validity is a strawman?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by dcrews

Houston, TX

Member since Feb 2011

30236 posts

Posted on 9/29/14 at 10:09 pm to BuckyBadger

I'm all about validity of the process if we must remain in our current voting form.

However, I think it's bogus that career welfare and food stamp recipients who contribute absolutely zilch to society (and in fact take away from it), get a say in how to spend yours and my tax dollars.

I feel the same about voting on local property tax rates. I don't yet own a home/land, so why should I have a say in how much someone should pay in property tax?

I'm also not talking about tiered voting or weighted voting based on money. I'm talking about the people contributing to society getting to decide where their contributed tax dollars get allocated.

It's not that I want everyone to agree with the way I vote, but I want everyone to be educated and informed when voting...not vote based on (R) or (D), white vs black, male vs female, etc...

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board