- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lulz so Obama and his wife want to eliminate sugar in vending machines
Posted on 9/18/14 at 5:45 pm to WildcatMike
Posted on 9/18/14 at 5:45 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
Actually, schools are telling parents not to have kids bring their own lunches. If the school gets federal funding, the kids have to eat the lunch provided by the school (unless they have a medical reason to bring lunch from home).
oh, that is ridiculous.
I hadn't heard that, do you have a link? A google search turned up what i was saying about bringing your own lunches.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 5:56 pm to TJG210
quote:
I wish we could corral all the liberals into one or two states and let them live in their own miserable existence and leave the rest of us alone.
We didn't have vending machines in the public schools when I was growing up. It didn't make us miserable. I'm very sorry you've got to have a daily injection of sugar water to keep from being miserable. That's kinda sad.
quote:
I'm sick of their nonsense and want to protect everyone from themselves.
What are you even talking about? If you want your school children to get diabetes - that's A-OK - you just have to turn down the federal handouts. It perplexes me that those who claim to be responsible government think their schools should get federal lunch handouts with no strings attached.
This post was edited on 9/18/14 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 9/18/14 at 5:59 pm to TJG210
quote:
I wish we could corral all the liberals into one or two states and let them live in their own miserable existence and leave the rest of us alone. I'm sick of their nonsense and want to protect everyone from themselves.
Have you seen the electoral map lately?
No worries. No one is stopping you from eating sugar. In fact buy a 5 lb bag and gull it down. You'll feel great when done!
Posted on 9/18/14 at 6:11 pm to mauser
quote:Ummm.....no thanks.
frick her.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 7:10 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
do you have a link? A google search turned up what i was saying about bringing your own lunches.
Do not have a link. I know an elementary school in Mt Sterling, KY receives federal funding for their lunch program. The deal is, the school has to follow the strict new regulated guidelines and all students have to eat the lunch…no lunch is allowed from home unless it is approved by the school board and have to have documentation from a medical doctor why it is needed to brought from home,
Posted on 9/18/14 at 7:11 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
If you want your school children to get diabetes
I am guessing you ARE pre-diabetic or diabetic….am I right?
Please stop.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 7:13 pm to SpidermanTUba
quote:
When did the WH become a public school?
You are too fricking stupid to see obvious hypocrisy.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 8:24 pm to WildcatMike
People are against this? Do we pride ourselves in our obesity rates?
Our country's socially acceptable eating habits are disgusting. The fact that people are upset about trying to remove processed food/drinks made up of nothing but sugar from access to kids who don't know any better about what they're doing to their body, says a lot about the problem itself.
Our country's socially acceptable eating habits are disgusting. The fact that people are upset about trying to remove processed food/drinks made up of nothing but sugar from access to kids who don't know any better about what they're doing to their body, says a lot about the problem itself.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 8:35 pm to Tigerfan56
I have no problem with the removal of processed food in vending machines. My problem is, the main person pushing this reform can not have the so called "shite food" removed out of the vending machine in the WH…in fact, WTF is there is vending machine in the WH to begin with. If she is pushing for healthy eating, then why not promote it in their own house?
Posted on 9/18/14 at 8:39 pm to burdman
quote:
This isn't a terrible idea
It's not a terrible idea for kids to avoid soda. It is a terrible idea for the Feds to mandate dietary restrictions and make that call. Whatever happened to being pro choice?
Posted on 9/18/14 at 9:24 pm to CptBengal
quote:you are a sad sad individual
Who says that thing in the white house is a woman?
Looks more like a tranny, a fat tranny, at that.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 9:32 pm to Freder
quote:
Heaven forbid they give children healthier options at the snack machine. That Michelle Obama is one evil bitch.
Exactly. Heaven forbid that we try to help these little fatasses. Their parents are most likely fatasses who are certainly not going to help them.
Posted on 9/18/14 at 9:34 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
I have no problem with the removal of processed food in vending machines. My problem is, the main person pushing this reform can not have the so called "shite food" removed out of the vending machine in the WH…in fact, WTF is there is vending machine in the WH to begin with. If she is pushing for healthy eating, then why not promote it in their own house?
I have to agree with you on this. It IS a bit hypocritical.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 6:38 am to mauser
quote:
frick her. Let's see her try to do something about what you can buy with food stamps. She ain't got the guts for that.
...What??? and alienate their ENTIRE support base!!! We have allowed the non-producers in this country to vote in an affirmative action president. Hope you all are happy with the results.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 7:03 am to Jim Ignatowski
By right wing definition a 'non producer' includes soldiers, retirees, and all low wage earners doing shite the rest of us don't have time to do ourselves - so its not really a useful definition. I don't know what I would do without the 'non producers' who take care of my son every weekday.
This post was edited on 9/19/14 at 7:05 am
Posted on 9/19/14 at 7:24 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
By right wing definition a 'non producer' includes soldiers, retirees, and all low wage earners doing shite the rest of us don't have time to do ourselves - so its not really a useful definition.
...bullshite!!! I'll tell exactly who I mean. It's not soldiers...they work and produce more than any!! It's not retirees...they have done their time and "paid" into the system. It's not low wage earners....they are WORKING!!! It's the non-working sloths whose career is receiving government assistance....it was their parent's career...and it will be their children's career!!! They are the ones who are the non-producers...they are the ones who have put this moron in office. By the way...you Dims have done an excellent job of perpetuating this class of people....guaranteed generations of a voting block!!
Posted on 9/19/14 at 7:47 am to Jim Ignatowski
quote:
By the way...you Dims have done an excellent job of perpetuating this class of people....guaranteed generations of a voting block!!
Dimocrats are they new plantation owners...as well as the new slave owners. Face facts TUba...you are what you claim to abhor!!
Posted on 9/19/14 at 7:52 am to WildcatMike
:insertracistjokeaboutblackpplandhoneybunshere:
bring back PE for atleast 50 minutes everyday and see what will happen with childhood obesity. Removing the junk food is a good thing though.
bring back PE for atleast 50 minutes everyday and see what will happen with childhood obesity. Removing the junk food is a good thing though.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 7:57 am to WeeWee
quote:
bring back PE for atleast 50 minutes everyday and see what will happen with childhood obesity.
This....more than...this...
quote:
Removing the junk food is a good thing though.
This is still America. It still should be our choice...not Moochelle.
Posted on 9/19/14 at 8:11 am to CptBengal
Lol "Moochelle". It's hilarious because it's taking her actual name, Michelle, and adding "moo" at the beginning, implying that she's a cow. It's also original.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News