- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/22/14 at 2:52 pm to siliconvalleytiger
Wow, it looked like having an experienced QB was their only advantage, and now they're willingly giving that up.. 
Posted on 8/22/14 at 2:54 pm to geauxaddai
he originally signed with South Carolina
Posted on 8/22/14 at 2:59 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:
he originally signed with South Carolina
Yes, but he literally has zero snaps as a D1 QB in a D1 college football game and is taking that first snap against LSU.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 3:15 pm to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
taking that first snap against LSU.
Bold.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 3:19 pm to nebraskafaninwi
quote:
t he literally has zero snaps as a D1 QB in a D1 college football game and is taking that first snap against LSU.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 3:48 pm to nebraskafaninwi
:insertyougonegetraped: gif
Posted on 8/22/14 at 3:52 pm to Boomtown
do you think we are preparing for both qb's?
Posted on 8/22/14 at 3:57 pm to Boomtown
Posted on 8/22/14 at 4:10 pm to geauxcoco
If this dude really played safety, he musta been the biggest on in the league. Dudes 6-6 220lbs
Posted on 8/22/14 at 4:11 pm to geauxaddai
Dude stated at safety last year making his first start against arguably the best defense in the SEC 
28-13 tigers
28-13 tigers
Posted on 8/22/14 at 4:23 pm to sunnydaze
I mean, it's not a bad tactic. With a mobile QB in the game, it forces the DL and LB to have to hesitate for just a sec.....which could be just enough time for Gordon/Clement to gain yds.......it kinda/sorta forces the defense to be more reactive vs. proactive.......
i don't see it really changing the outcome of the game (LSU winning), of course not, but that's the logic that Wisconsin is following going down this rabbit hole.....!!!!
i don't see it really changing the outcome of the game (LSU winning), of course not, but that's the logic that Wisconsin is following going down this rabbit hole.....!!!!
Posted on 8/22/14 at 4:27 pm to fan251
The decision to go with McEnvoy wasn't about which QB is better, Wisconsin is trying to develop a game plan to slow down/prevent LSU downhill pass rush.........and to give Gordon & Clement the best chance at success running the ball......
This has nothing to do with choosing the "best" QB for the job no more than it does "we have to slow down LSU and give our backs a chance"........
This has nothing to do with choosing the "best" QB for the job no more than it does "we have to slow down LSU and give our backs a chance"........
Posted on 8/22/14 at 4:29 pm to fan251
quote:
The decision to go with McEnvoy wasn't about which QB is better, Wisconsin is trying to develop a game plan to slow down/prevent LSU downhill pass rush.........and to give Gordon & Clement the best chance at success running the ball......
This plus I can't help but think they are not happy with the progression at the WR position. I feel as if they know we will stack the box and go 1 on 1 with the wideouts so why not to with the more mobile QB.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 4:33 pm to diglet13
quote:
This plus I can't help but think they are not happy with the progression at the WR position. I feel as if they know we will stack the box and go 1 on 1 with the wideouts so why not to with the more mobile QB
Exactly!!!
Posted on 8/22/14 at 4:38 pm to diglet13
quote:
so why not to with the more mobile QB.
Badgers better hope McEnvoy pulls a Cam Newton and not a Darron Thomas or Johnny Manziel. Seems likely
Posted on 8/22/14 at 4:48 pm to geauxaddai
quote:
Sources tell Journal Sentinel Tanner McEvoy expected to start opener vs. LSU.
somebody didn't tell Big Bad Badger...
Sources tell Journal Sentinel Tanner McEvoy expected to start opener vs. LSU.
somebody didn't tell Big Bad Badger...
Posted on 8/22/14 at 5:11 pm to diglet13
quote:
This plus I can't help but think they are not happy with the progression at the WR position. I feel as if they know we will stack the box and go 1 on 1 with the wideouts so why not to with the more mobile QB.
I agree, they have to be thinking they can't pass against us anyway so why not have a guy that can run. That said we will surely have 9 in the box now.
Most guys having their debut against us have suffered big time. I will be shocked if this ends well for this guy.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 6:14 pm to geauxcoco
quote:
I think this BS to mess with Chief....
of course it is. it's the pre-game dance. LSU has faced both type of qb's (that they have) and Chavis will be ready for either.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 6:24 pm to LSU GrandDad
Could be that too since
1. Everyone seems shocked
2. Dude said he'd name his guy next week
Could Stave be injured?
1. Everyone seems shocked
2. Dude said he'd name his guy next week
Could Stave be injured?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News