- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:39 am to Circle K Beggar
quote:
Oh, I know. The quotation marks went right over your head.
I think my remark went over your head, Toto.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:39 am to Lsut81
quote:
he key demographic (young and african american) that came out in droves for the last two elections will not be there for the next.
Maybe, but if Hillary is the Democratic nominee (I'm not 100% sure she'll run - she looks absolutely terrible and I tend to believe the rumors about her health) then there will be a similar record turnout amongst women. There would also be plenty of moderate women who have voted for Republicans in the past but would vote for Hillary (even if they told their Republican husbands something different).
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:41 am to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
Rand
will vote for in a heartbeat
quote:
Jeb
this would force me to vote 3rd party
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:42 am to DeltaDoc
quote:
Reality, no one. The electoral college is too far gone now. The Democrats have 40% of the votes they need by winning three states (CA, IL and NY). Those are automatics. Throw in FL and OH, which are near automatic now, and you have statistically almost no chance of a GOP president.
I am of the mindset that the GOP WH ship has sailed.
The electoral college is actually a huge saving grace for Republicans - it forces the Democrats to spread their assets. If we ever went to the popular vote, the Dems could easily set up shop in the top 15 populace cities in America and just hammer the GOTV. Think of how many unmined African American/hispanic votes there are in the NYC, Chicago, LA because the Dems don't sweat the GOTV there - those states are arleady safely blue. Ditto for Dallas, Houston, New Orleans (where the states are safely red - no need to mine all those Dem votes). It would be an unmitigated disaster for the Republicans.
Further, your assertion that FL and OH are "near automatic" for the Democrats now is retarded.
This post was edited on 8/22/14 at 10:44 am
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:43 am to SirWinston
quote:
Further, your assertion that FL and OH are "near automatic" for the Democrats now is retarded
not really. you have a lot of people on the dole in those states, and we all know who they pull the lever for
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:45 am to Circle K Beggar
McCain would have won Florida easily if he had picked Lieberman instead of the BBC-loving bimbo.
Romney would have won Florida easily if he had picked Rubio instead of Ryan. He'd have had better performances in Colorado, NM, Nevada as well.
Romney would have won Florida easily if he had picked Rubio instead of Ryan. He'd have had better performances in Colorado, NM, Nevada as well.
This post was edited on 8/22/14 at 10:46 am
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:46 am to SirWinston
quote:
Lieberman
actual former Democrat
quote:
Rubio
Democrat in red clothing
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:47 am to Circle K Beggar
then what is Romney?
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:48 am to SirWinston
quote:
then what is Romney?
very moderate Republican
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:49 am to Circle K Beggar
Romney is easily more liberal than Rubio. Easily. He's arguably more liberal than Lieberman.,
This post was edited on 8/22/14 at 10:50 am
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:50 am to SirWinston
quote:
Romney is easily more liberal than Rubio. Easily.
I don't know about that. Rubio's views on illegal immigration/amnesty showed his true colors.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:51 am to SirWinston
quote:
Romney would have won Florida easily if he had picked Rubio instead of Ryan. He'd have had better performances in Colorado, NM, Nevada as well.
Its amazing but Ryan didn't bring a single vote to the ticket that Romney didn't already have.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:57 am to Last call
None of them. Whoever gets the nomination has no chance. If he wins a debate it will be a sign of the Republican "war on women." If he loses a debate he will be seen as weak because be lost to a women. There will be no way to get positive press. The Dems will win and it will have nothing to do with policies.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 11:05 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
None of them. Whoever gets the nomination has no chance. If he wins a debate it will be a sign of the Republican "war on women." If he loses a debate he will be seen as weak because be lost to a women. There will be no way to get positive press. The Dems will win and it will have nothing to do with policies.
So a male Republican candidate has never beaten a female Democratic candidate in a high-profile race?
Posted on 8/22/14 at 11:10 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
There will be no way to get positive press. The Dems will win and it will have nothing to do with policies.
That's why the GOP will have to nominate has great charisma. The general election is a marketing campaign. Who would you rather have a beer with. That's where Romney failed in 2016 and I hope that is what he would improve on in 2016 if he were to run. Hillary will be strong but she won't be near as formidable as she would've been in 2008.
This post was edited on 8/22/14 at 11:39 am
Posted on 8/22/14 at 11:15 am to SirWinston
quote:
The electoral college is actually a huge saving grace for Republicans - it forces the Democrats to spread their assets. If we ever went to the popular vote, the Dems could easily set up shop in the top 15 populace cities in America and just hammer the GOTV. Think of how many unmined African American/hispanic votes there are in the NYC, Chicago, LA because the Dems don't sweat the GOTV there - those states are arleady safely blue. Ditto for Dallas, Houston, New Orleans (where the states are safely red - no need to mine all those Dem votes). It would be an unmitigated disaster for the Republicans.
I beg to differ with you here, the numbers of Demacrat voters would increase without a doubt but The republican would be able to pick up tens of millions of votes from the more populated states where they get none currently. More people voted republican in CA in the last election than live in the state of LA. The electoral college protects the Dems right now.
Posted on 8/22/14 at 11:45 am to LSURussian
quote:Only he has the voice that can confront Hillary and brand her as Obama's 3rd term, and make it stick. His side will have to keep this terrible thought out there for the bulk of 2016. He will need to stay on message and not try to please all people. She will be ruthless. He will need to be teflon and Reagan cool.
Romney
This post was edited on 8/22/14 at 11:48 am
Posted on 8/22/14 at 11:53 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
bomb...and Col. Allen West could spring to the top.
LOVE. THIS. GUY.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would vote for West in a hot minute! I know MANY other people who feel the same way.
The guy hates liberals....so I love him!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News