Started By
Message

re: Astros Drama Continues......

Posted on 7/19/14 at 3:34 pm to
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6106 posts
Posted on 7/19/14 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

I wish someone would ask Boras to expand on the comment he made about the way Close handled the situation. But it isn't any fun for writers to speculate that side may have done something stupid.

I could tell you what he meant. He NEVER would have agreed to an under-slot deal in the first place. Aiken was the consensus #1 talent in the draft - why should he take under-slot?
Aiken's agent bears a lot of the responsibility here.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76803 posts
Posted on 7/19/14 at 3:46 pm to
There are plenty of people stuck on stupid if they think the Astros "being cheap" had anything to do with this situation. What they decided to do to rebuild and the Aiken affair are not related.

Houston was ready to give him $6.5 million, allowing them to also get a value 5th rounder in Nix with the money that the rules ALLOW them to spend without losing future draft picks.

Then, it is found out that Aiken has this UCL issue. So the Astros decided that they would lower the offer to Aiken. Why? Because the choice became taking the risk on Aiken and getting both Nix and another Top 100 prospect in 21st rounder Marshall with the remaining money pool. Houston wanted to spend ALL of the money they are ALLOWED to spend according to MLB rules.

Why didn't the Astros give in here? Because the rules said they didn't have to take the risk on Aiken just to be nice. They get the #2 overall pick next year plus their own first rounder. It's a virtual do-over, and any organization with a brain would have done the same thing.

The Astros did not plan some elaborate bait-and-switch. Teams are not permitted to require a physical until they draft a player (again, those are the rules), so they didn't know they were getting potentially damaged goods.

Luhnow did the right thing. Get three top 100 prospects with one hurt or take the do-over. You can hate what Houston has done to rebuild, but they were dead-on in this case.
This post was edited on 7/19/14 at 3:48 pm
Posted by MOT
Member since Jul 2006
28071 posts
Posted on 7/19/14 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

I could tell you what he meant. He NEVER would have agreed to an under-slot deal in the first place. Aiken was the consensus #1 talent in the draft - why should he take under-slot?


Maybe, but it isn't like the original offer was unfair or unreasonable. I'm wondering if he meant he would have been in front of the situation and not let the Astros discover it on their own.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram