- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Astros Drama Continues......
Posted on 7/19/14 at 3:34 pm to MOT
Posted on 7/19/14 at 3:34 pm to MOT
quote:
I wish someone would ask Boras to expand on the comment he made about the way Close handled the situation. But it isn't any fun for writers to speculate that side may have done something stupid.
I could tell you what he meant. He NEVER would have agreed to an under-slot deal in the first place. Aiken was the consensus #1 talent in the draft - why should he take under-slot?
Aiken's agent bears a lot of the responsibility here.
Posted on 7/19/14 at 3:46 pm to Overbrook
There are plenty of people stuck on stupid if they think the Astros "being cheap" had anything to do with this situation. What they decided to do to rebuild and the Aiken affair are not related.
Houston was ready to give him $6.5 million, allowing them to also get a value 5th rounder in Nix with the money that the rules ALLOW them to spend without losing future draft picks.
Then, it is found out that Aiken has this UCL issue. So the Astros decided that they would lower the offer to Aiken. Why? Because the choice became taking the risk on Aiken and getting both Nix and another Top 100 prospect in 21st rounder Marshall with the remaining money pool. Houston wanted to spend ALL of the money they are ALLOWED to spend according to MLB rules.
Why didn't the Astros give in here? Because the rules said they didn't have to take the risk on Aiken just to be nice. They get the #2 overall pick next year plus their own first rounder. It's a virtual do-over, and any organization with a brain would have done the same thing.
The Astros did not plan some elaborate bait-and-switch. Teams are not permitted to require a physical until they draft a player (again, those are the rules), so they didn't know they were getting potentially damaged goods.
Luhnow did the right thing. Get three top 100 prospects with one hurt or take the do-over. You can hate what Houston has done to rebuild, but they were dead-on in this case.
Houston was ready to give him $6.5 million, allowing them to also get a value 5th rounder in Nix with the money that the rules ALLOW them to spend without losing future draft picks.
Then, it is found out that Aiken has this UCL issue. So the Astros decided that they would lower the offer to Aiken. Why? Because the choice became taking the risk on Aiken and getting both Nix and another Top 100 prospect in 21st rounder Marshall with the remaining money pool. Houston wanted to spend ALL of the money they are ALLOWED to spend according to MLB rules.
Why didn't the Astros give in here? Because the rules said they didn't have to take the risk on Aiken just to be nice. They get the #2 overall pick next year plus their own first rounder. It's a virtual do-over, and any organization with a brain would have done the same thing.
The Astros did not plan some elaborate bait-and-switch. Teams are not permitted to require a physical until they draft a player (again, those are the rules), so they didn't know they were getting potentially damaged goods.
Luhnow did the right thing. Get three top 100 prospects with one hurt or take the do-over. You can hate what Houston has done to rebuild, but they were dead-on in this case.
This post was edited on 7/19/14 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 7/19/14 at 3:53 pm to Overbrook
quote:
I could tell you what he meant. He NEVER would have agreed to an under-slot deal in the first place. Aiken was the consensus #1 talent in the draft - why should he take under-slot?
Maybe, but it isn't like the original offer was unfair or unreasonable. I'm wondering if he meant he would have been in front of the situation and not let the Astros discover it on their own.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News