Started By
Message
locked post

The myth of the Caliphate

Posted on 7/10/14 at 1:06 pm
Posted by Bayou Sam
Istanbul
Member since Aug 2009
5921 posts
Posted on 7/10/14 at 1:06 pm
Nice article in Al-Jazeera: LINK

quote:

Caliph or Khalifa in Arabic, is used in Islamic tradition to connote theological successors to prophets. According to Sunni Muslims, the prophet of Islam had four "Rightly Guided" caliphs; subsequent caliphs were principally political leaders. A myth developed with the abolition of the Ottoman Caliphate in 1924, which advocated that to restore Islamic power it was necessary to unite all Muslims under a single caliphate.

Osama bin Laden lamented in a speech that the Muslim world had been deprived of a caliphate since the Ottomans. Few Muslims noticed the amusing irony in his comments. His Wahhabi-Saudi compatriots had revolted against the Ottomans, and hence that very caliphate.

The Ottoman caliphate coincided with the Safavid caliphate and the Mughal Empire, which occasionally claimed a caliphate. The Ottomans and the Safavids even went to war with each other. So, the idea of Islamic unity under a political caliphate, rather than a prophetic one, has no basis in history. Until Muslim scholars make that point clear, the uneducated will continue to be radicalised by false political notions.



And the rousing conclusion:

quote:

Muslims will always be attracted to the idea of restoring the dignity and leadership of their faith. They can best do this by reading history and pondering over the Quran. When Europe was gripped by centuries of violent religious bigotry, the 17th century English philosopher John Locke wrote enviously about the way in which Christians of all sects and Jews were able to worship freely in the Ottoman realm. The Quran goes beyond tolerance by making recognition of all religions an article of faith in Islam.

The most powerful weapon against extremist ideology is the knowledge that Islamic empires were not exclusively sustained by powerful armies - as was the case of Rome - nor supported by a strong naval fleet, as was the case in the British Empire. The sun set on Islamic power when it handed leadership over to the West in building societies dedicated to pluralism and knowledge - values that Islamic theology champions more highly than a martial jihad.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16847 posts
Posted on 7/10/14 at 1:18 pm to
enlightening
Posted by CroakaBait
Gulf Coast of the Land Mass
Member since Nov 2013
3978 posts
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Christians of all sects and Jews were able to worship freely in the Ottoman realm.

John Locke's dumb arse never met my Catholic Croatian ancestors who were enslaved by these frickers.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Islamic empires were not exclusively sustained by powerful armies


I don't think that is true. The Ottomans had one of the most powerful militaries the world had ever seen. It declined because it militarily declined. The Ottoman Empire was lost because of the First World War and a belief by the Turks that governing Arabs wan't worth it.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64802 posts
Posted on 7/10/14 at 3:48 pm to
Al-muslim news
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28897 posts
Posted on 7/11/14 at 8:29 am to
The article was kind of all over the place. I not sure what myth they were trying to dispel.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35148 posts
Posted on 7/11/14 at 9:27 am to
Yeah. Read Robert Spencer's "The Myth of Islamic Tolerance". No frills or spin or complex philosophy/theology. Just boring-assed historical facts aplenty!

Enjoy your 'dhimmitude', BS.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram