Started By
Message

re: Renting out property without mortgage holder's consent

Posted on 6/27/14 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by CHSBears
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
779 posts
Posted on 6/27/14 at 3:22 pm to
Homestead exemption will/could become an issue. If WF is escrowing for taxes/insurance and then get a large tax bill, they might inquire as to why.
Posted by tiger94gop
GEISMAR
Member since Nov 2004
2923 posts
Posted on 6/27/14 at 4:09 pm to
It is in all conventional mortgage language (Fannie/Freddie) that the mortgage cannot be assumed. This means that someone else cannot benefit off of your credit profile. Since the bonds that financed it are based off of your credit and not the new buyer's. Rental could be a gray area. There are hardship scenarios where you can rent it, but you would have to look at the actual language. However, the risk factors are far higher on rentals than owner/occupied. I believe then a bond backed mortgage would be able to be moved to immediate acceleration for the same reason. So yeah, don't tell them or they could" call your note. Most people change their insurance coverage when it becomes rental property, that is when they usually find out. We always had people who tried to finance rentals as owner/occupied, we could always tell by the insurance and the taxes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram