- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Renting out property without mortgage holder's consent
Posted on 6/27/14 at 3:22 pm to Fearthehat0307
Posted on 6/27/14 at 3:22 pm to Fearthehat0307
Homestead exemption will/could become an issue. If WF is escrowing for taxes/insurance and then get a large tax bill, they might inquire as to why.
Posted on 6/27/14 at 4:09 pm to CHSBears
It is in all conventional mortgage language (Fannie/Freddie) that the mortgage cannot be assumed. This means that someone else cannot benefit off of your credit profile. Since the bonds that financed it are based off of your credit and not the new buyer's. Rental could be a gray area. There are hardship scenarios where you can rent it, but you would have to look at the actual language. However, the risk factors are far higher on rentals than owner/occupied. I believe then a bond backed mortgage would be able to be moved to immediate acceleration for the same reason. So yeah, don't tell them or they could" call your note. Most people change their insurance coverage when it becomes rental property, that is when they usually find out. We always had people who tried to finance rentals as owner/occupied, we could always tell by the insurance and the taxes.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News