Because he's the only owner who actually broke his contract. It isn't against the league's constitution to make racist remarks, but it is to make remarks that have an adverse affect on the league. No one else has made remarks that have caused sponsors to threaten to leave.

4 ...

Report Post

Posted by massiveattack

CharLIT/Chapel Chill

Member since Oct 2010

11561 posts

Posted on 6/13/14 at 1:06 pm to VOLhalla

Well we don't know that yet. Doesn't have to be just remarks does it? What if these investigators bring to light actions of other owners that cause sponsors to leave? Then what

Out of the 29 others, you know they'll be able to find at least 1 big skeleton.

This post was edited on 6/13/14 at 1:08 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerintheNO

New Orleans

Member since Jan 2004

41296 posts

Posted on 6/13/14 at 1:06 pm to VOLhalla

quote:
No one else has made remarks that have caused sponsors to threaten to leave.

Are you sure? Or have the statements just not been made public yet?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by novabill

Crossville, TN

Member since Sep 2005

10479 posts

Posted on 6/14/14 at 1:09 am to VOLhalla

quote:
No one else has made remarks that have caused sponsors to threaten to leave.

But, what if DS causes those comments to become public, then those owners have to be booted as well?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Sophandros

Victoria Concordia Crescit

Member since Feb 2005

45218 posts

Posted on 6/14/14 at 6:46 am to VOLhalla

If it was just the remarks, all the "Team Sterling" idiots would have a valid point.

But it isn't.

This is about a 30+ year history with this guy, and at some point David Stern needs to be held accountable for enabling this piece of shite.

1 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board