- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Feinstein/Boxer Introduce Federal Bill to Confiscate Guns
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:54 pm to BamaFan89
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:54 pm to BamaFan89
It's because of folks like Feinstein and Boxer that some rural northern California counties are trying to seceed from the state and form a new state. They resent the fact that the folks in San Francisco and Los Angeles can impose their anti-gun agenda on them just because they're outnumbered. There's also a similar sentiment in upstate New York where the rural New Yorkers are at the mercy of the gungrabbers in New York City because they have the numbers. Any government that has to rule over people who are very diverse culturally, will always be susceptible to secession movements. Just look at what's going on in Europe these days, in Scotland, Venice and Catalonia.
0
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:54 pm to CptBengal
quote:I don't know about mass, but it would certainly be ripe for abuse and as a stepping stone to more restrictions, I MEAN, protections.
Anyone who thinks this wouldnt be used for mass confiscation is a moron.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:54 pm to USMCTiger03
quote:
Semantics. The end result and purpose is confiscation.
You are dumb.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:57 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
You have freedom of speech but try saying you have a bomb on a plane. Try saying frick on TV. Freedom of the press? Try publishing kiddie porn. Freedom of religion? Try polygamy if you're a Mormon
You got all that out of me asking why a sitting senator doesn't understand the bill of rights? stretch much?
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:57 pm to USMCTiger03
quote:
I don't know about mass,
guaranteed no veteran would be allowed to own a gun.
nobody who takes SSRIs or any other mental meds (like in NY currently)
Nobody who flies the gadsen flag, or uses cash
THE SAME frickING CRITERIA THEY USE TO DETERMINE "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS"
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:58 pm to yumahog
Has the video of Feinstein been posted yet if here saying she would round up and confiscate every gun if she had the votes?
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:59 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
quote:
Semantics. The end result and purpose is confiscation.
You are dumb.
Your opinion is quite worthless.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:59 pm to wickowick
Has the video of Feinstein been posted yet if here saying she would round up and confiscate every gun if she had the votes?
Mr. And Mrs. America...turn em in!
-feinstein
Mr. And Mrs. America...turn em in!
-feinstein
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:00 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
Vegas Bengal
You really this hot headed IRL?
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:02 pm to DonChowder
I find it kind of funny that these libs will make a case against law abiding citizens, but won't go after gangs to turn their guns in.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:05 pm to Pettifogger
quote:all there is to it, the paranoia by some on the right is hysterical.
Intended to score minor political points against the GOP.
Nobody's coming to take your guns, geez.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:05 pm to CptBengal
quote:
what scares me is these people consider distrusting your government a mental problem.
Anyone who thinks this wouldnt be used for mass confiscation is a moron.
It's hard enough trusting politicians who are exclusively U.S. citizens. If I'm not mistaken, neither of these are.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:07 pm to TT9
quote:
Nobody's coming to take your guns, geez.
Damn right they are not.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:14 pm to yumahog
quote:
Damn right they are not.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:19 pm to yumahog
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:21 pm to wickowick
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:23 pm to BamaFan89
Four - A revolution ensues when the first law abiding citizen is stripped of their second amendment right.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:28 pm to yumahog
quote:In your crazy world prisoners and terrorists should have guns? Because "shall not be infringed" means absolutely no restrictions or laws, right? Or can you be stripped of rights (including the 2nd amendment) if the law dictates that you are a danger to others or yourself?
What part of "shall not be infringed" do they not understand, the knuckleheads.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 3:53 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Because "shall not be infringed" means absolutely no restrictions or laws, right? Or can you be stripped of rights (including the 2nd amendment) if the law dictates that you are a danger to others or yourself?
Guns aren't the problem. It's people. If a person has shown to be a real present danger (of grave harm) to themselves or others, they should be locked up...without anything that can be used as a weapon, I might add.
This post was edited on 6/6/14 at 3:56 pm
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News