- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana Coastal Erosion.
Posted on 5/28/14 at 7:13 pm to TH03
Posted on 5/28/14 at 7:13 pm to TH03
quote:
how exactly would it be the fault of the oil companies?
you can quantify the effect in 2 ways: direct removal which would be direct digging of channels and intrusion/erosion/habitat loss that was precipitated by the construction of those channels. the Houma Navigation Canal, Calcasieu Ship Channel, and MRGO are all large scale examples of what thousands of small oilfield canals have done to ecosystems. they create direct pathways for saltwater to kill off brackish and freshwater plant species, which held together the soil...they also introduce much higher energy (waves) and velocities (currents) of water to areas which used to be 'calm.' since those areas now have nothing holding their soil together, they erode and disappear. the low end of estimates from several studies of land loss caused by oil companies are in the range 10% of all land loss since 1930s or so. thats what is easily directly provable. high end estimates are up to several times larger.
This post was edited on 5/28/14 at 7:15 pm
Posted on 5/28/14 at 7:16 pm to man in the stadium
I would think that trying to move a large body of water in ways it does not want to be moved would have a much larger effect.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News