re: FYI: no-fat and low-fat milk is more likely to make you obese than whole milk

2% and skim are vastly different.

On topic: what's important is that adults drinking whole over skim are making a damn poor choice. Paint it any way you want to, saturated fat is saturated fat.

It's like saying studies have proven diet coke can increase appetite, so I suppose drinking coke is a better alternative.

quote:

---

On topic: what's important is that adults drinking whole over skim are making a damn poor choice. Paint it any way you want to, saturated fat is saturated fat.

---

Well, heres the problem.

quote:

---

A central issue is what replaces saturated fat if someone reduces the amount of saturated fat in their diet. If it is replaced with refined starch or sugar, which are the largest sources of calories in the U.S. diet, then the risk of heart disease remains the same.

---

The study clearly says that when reducing saturated fats, humans replace it with something more deadly. Whole milk satisfies the appetite, which in the long run is the healthier choice

School lunch requirements are a joke.

quote:

---

have a lower BMI

---

Worthless

It's really simple. We already know everything we need to know about non health-related obesity. Eat well, get enough exercise to burn off what you eat, build healthy muscle. It truly requires no more study.

quote:

---

Worthless

It's really simple. We already know everything we need to know about non health-related obesity. Eat well, get enough exercise to burn off what you eat, build healthy muscle. It truly requires no more study.

---

Umm...apparently it does require more study.

You're not gonna' exercise enough in a day to burn off what you eat unless A)you're running marathons or B)you're eating at a severe deficit. There's plenty of evidence to substantiate that exercise (either anaerobic/aerobic) doesn't burn a ton of calories unless it's done for hours upon hours.

How you eat controls what size you are. Exercise simply shapes that size.

Almond milk ftw

If we are talking about a fat target group and their consumption of skim milk, you shouldn't be surprised to find out they do much worse than not drink whole milk.

If the baseline is the non-obese folks, them avoiding whole milk for a fat free option is better regardless of what a study targeting obese people says.

And for the UK study, the study simply states that for the relatively modest sample size, they can't draw any firm conclusions with sat fat and CVD........citing random studies doesn't make the point valid.

You should see what raw milk does for the body vs pasteurized.

Is agree though, whole milk or no milk.

So it's genetic differences in population that explains this?:[

It seems we are evolving rapidly: