- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:06 am to KLSU
quote:
Principle still the same..
Not even close
People like this defending Sterling sure doesn't help his case.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:09 am to ShortyRob
quote:
You think BHP's assertion was incorrect?
Actually I think what he said is correct and I wish I hadn't said the word Christian because it detracts from my point. The point is that only certain segments of the population are above being spoken Ill of apparently and Sterling would have been treated the same way if the NBA were only 10% black because saying anything against blacks is taboo.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:24 am to KLSU
Pretty dumb post, but the pussification of our society is astounding. For grown arse men to be so affected by the words of an old arse man is embarrassing to me. The "emotional time" and "healing" etc the Clippers had to go through was nauseating to hear about. An old bastard said some shitty things. Is anyone surprised or really that hurt? I'm hoping it's just media sensationalizing it for a story, but the grown arse men of the NBA sure as frick played along with the "we had to push through the difficult time" bullshite. Not once did I hear from media or players "the old man is a scoundrel and we all knew that. Let's be adults and move on. Not that big a deal." Very disappointing.
/rant
I did enjoy seeing Big Baby on the floor though... I guess I'm pulling for the Clippers!
/rant
I did enjoy seeing Big Baby on the floor though... I guess I'm pulling for the Clippers!
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:30 am to SoulGlo
first of all this whole thread is pointless because HE HAD BYLAWS TO FOLLOW!!! WTF
* this has zero to do with baby jesus religion has no purpose in politics or education
* this has zero to do with baby jesus religion has no purpose in politics or education
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:34 am to SoulGlo
quote:
SoulGlo
I agree 100%. Way to let your SoulGlo shine through!
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:34 am to KLSU
Beware, you may want to keep your racism in check before you take your company to an association comprised of other business men that can reserve the right to kick you out if your actions make the association look bad.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 10:36 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:48 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
AND
These Christian employees are so upset that they may stop working...
This is the part that is worthy of criticism. Is it reasonable for a Christian athlete to decide to strike during "the most crucial point of the business cycle" because someone overheard the owner, in private, saying that he thinks christians are all crazy and that he hates them all? Keep in mind, he has employed them and hasn't discriminated against them at all.
The thought that the NBA didn't have a standing to force Sterling out is crazy. However, there is a real argument that the position the players took was inappropriate.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 10:49 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:52 am to moneyg
quote:
Is it reasonable for a Christian athlete to decide to strike during "the most crucial point of the business cycle" because someone overheard the owner, in private, saying that he thinks christians are all crazy and that he hates them all?
How would you stop it?
Posted on 4/30/14 at 11:01 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
How would you stop it?
What does that have to do with anything?
The point I'm making is that people are rightfully concerned with someone being persecuted for their personal, private beliefs.
Many of those people are wrongfully pointing to the NBA when making that statement. There is a real argument to be made against the players association though if the latest stories about the players threatening to strike are true.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 11:03 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 11:04 am to moneyg
quote:
What does that have to do with anything?
You asked if it was inappropriate. I think that question is irrelevant. Do they have the ability to not play? Yes. Could you stop it without the force of law? Probably not.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 11:46 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
You asked if it was inappropriate. I think that question is irrelevant.
Theoretically, you would "stop it" by enforcing whatever provisions exist within the collective bargaining agreement with the players. There is no accusation from the current players that the owners aren't living up to the the CBA or are engaging in discrimination or any other activity that would indicate a hostile workplace. Work stoppage is a huge issue and the players would be violating the collective bargaining agreement. I don't know what the legal recourse would be, but I don't think it matters.
But, that doesn't go to my point that the NBA acting to protect its self interest is rational. The players unilaterally deciding that they won't play if an owner isn't removed simply because they disagree with who he is behind closed doors, is not.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News