Started By
Message

re: this Nevada issue highlights the true divide in this country....

Posted on 4/13/14 at 9:11 am to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124424 posts
Posted on 4/13/14 at 9:11 am to
quote:

and if the farmer doesn't want to sell or allow the pipeline on his/her land, you think the gov (that would be your "conservative" reps) and big oil are just gonna walk away? ...

You're comparing an issue involving private land, and private companies with Harry Reid's attempt at a public land grab in Nevada?

If it comes up in Keystone, it will be settled in the courts.
Posted by H.M. Murdock
B.A.'s Van
Member since Feb 2013
2113 posts
Posted on 4/13/14 at 9:17 am to
quote:

You're comparing an issue involving private land, and private companies


They don't understand that much, how do you expect them to understand anything?
Posted by HeadLightBanDit
Hernando, MS
Member since Oct 2012
1413 posts
Posted on 4/13/14 at 9:22 am to
It doesn't matter. Both situations involve the concept of Imminent domain. Like it or not the government can take your property, any property, public or private, and use it how they see fit. They will offer you "fair market value" and you can take it or get forced off your property.
This post was edited on 4/13/14 at 9:23 am
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 4/13/14 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

NC_Tigah
this Nevada issue highlights the true divide in this country....
quote:
and if the farmer doesn't want to sell or allow the pipeline on his/her land, you think the gov (that would be your "conservative" reps) and big oil are just gonna walk away? ...

You're comparing an issue involving private land, and private companies with Harry Reid's attempt at a public land grab in Nevada?

If it comes up in Keystone, it will be settled in the courts.


wouldn't surprise me if reid and his influence are behind this, but i'll leave him out of the argument ... the debate, sans reid, is whether this individual has the right to protest, in whatever manner, the government's handling of property he claims he has some right to use ... yes, those are private companies/landowners along the pipeline route ... someone will, at the behest of the companies, intervene to make the landowners give up their land should they refuse ... that 'someone' is the government, be it courts or eminent domain laws or whatever ... there are a lot of folks on here who will be claiming "the law's the law - landowner's just gotta give it up" ... because they want the pipeline since it fits with their agenda - jobs ... as is the case, most "conservatives" are fine with conservatism, as long as it's not in their "backyard", i.e. wallet ...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram