Started By
Message

re: Princeton law prof weighs in on what Mozilla decision means

Posted on 4/8/14 at 9:20 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425498 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Where are the other examples?

there are a ton of highly profile cases where gays tried to force those who don't agree with them to provide goods/services. then they litigate. a really famous one was in the news yesterday b/c cert was denied in the case.

you either believe what they believe, or you will be attacked. even as a person who believes most of what they believe, i detest their methods.

quote:

then yeah you can't claim this behavior is widespread from the pro gay rights crowd.

protests trying to force those of divergent thinking to either assimilate or be punished is widespread. are you denying that?
Posted by Python
Member since May 2008
6323 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 10:18 am to
What happened to Captain Brannigan?
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
42618 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 12:21 pm to
So using your logic, let's take a few examples of X and then extrapolate that to the entire group to draw ridiculous conclusions about what might happen in the future? Seems like some serious over generalization about the gay rights cause just to fit your agenda.

Btw, the group think on here > the gay rights crowd

Eta: I clearly stated that I don't agree with Mozilla. But I don't see tthe point of using this as a way to generalize an entire movement.
This post was edited on 4/8/14 at 12:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram