Started By
Message

re: Spinoff Thread - Piercing a baby's ears = Trashy?

Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:38 pm to
Posted by lsufan_26
Member since Feb 2004
12559 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:38 pm to
Everything on the OT is considered trashy
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69424 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

I saw the pic that was posted in another thread of a 3 month old baby with ears pierced. Is this considered trashy? I just think it looks so stupid on babies. What's the consensus?




Jesus why start this thread again.

Too bad ChadLSUBoy is banned, he had started the first and epic one.

The OT thinks almost everything is trashy.
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:38 pm to
That makes sense to me.
Posted by Politiceaux
Member since Feb 2009
17654 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:38 pm to
Yes, quite. Pretty sure it's a religious tenant of Mexicanity, though.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
34035 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

You are reading too much into what I said. I didn't mean that it's cruel to do it. I just think it's something that you let your kid decide when they want to do it instead of piercing them at 3 months old so your baby can have "bling."


So, how many kids do you have?

FYI, women don't like their little princess looking like an old man and having every stranger say want a handsome little boy they have.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
80372 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:38 pm to
Yes.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69424 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:40 pm to
2010

quote:

Has to be the easiest way to tell if the parents are white trash (without even having to look at the parents).







2012 list of all things trashy on the OT
Posted by Politiceaux
Member since Feb 2009
17654 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

FYI, women don't like their little princess looking like an old man and having every stranger say want a handsome little boy they have.
Yeah, piercing a baby's ears makes so much more sense than dressing a girl like a girl. Your wife seems bright.
Posted by lsugrldej8
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2006
2347 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

FYI, women don't like their little princess looking like an old man and having every stranger say want a handsome little boy they have.


Piercing their ears doesn't stop this. Dress you daughter up in girl clothes and little bows (I'm not into this bigger bows than the child's head thing)...and if someone calls her a he it honestly doesn't matter.
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

FYI, women don't like their little princess looking like an old man and having every stranger say want a handsome little boy they have.


Yeah, that statement only confirms your trashiness, because you can't see the obvious and easy solution to this problem.

I bet your solution to making sure that someone can tell that your baby is a boy is to pierce his dick and just let it hang out all the time huh?
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 4:48 pm
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
34035 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:47 pm to
You tard. Where in my post did I claim women were rational?
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:52 pm to
Women are not rational. But there is still a difference between a trashy woman and non-trashy woman. Also, a non-trash alpha male would never let his wife do this to his baby.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35585 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:53 pm to
My parents let me get mine pierced in 1st grade, so about 6 or 7? But some girls already had theirs pierced, which is why I wanted mine pierced.
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
116246 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:55 pm to
Nice answer to the OP.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35585 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:57 pm to
Oh, haha, well I was reading the thread and saw that question

I don't think it's necessarily trashy, but if I have daughters some day, I'll let them make the decision for themselves just like my parents did.
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 4:58 pm
Posted by lsunurse
Member since Dec 2005
129071 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 4:59 pm to
Same
Posted by AUtigR24
Happy Hour
Member since Apr 2011
19755 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 5:00 pm to
No. Most little girls and babies in general ddon't have a lot of hair so moms want you to know tthey're a girl. Also if you get them done while they are very young they can't reach up and mess with them / pull on them.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72683 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 5:00 pm to
I think you should let them get pierced about the time they start using a touch of makeup. for my daughters it happened when we decided...at 12.

You gonna bling them up???...How about some rouge?, eye liner?, mascara??? Lip stick?
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35585 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 5:02 pm to
I didn't wear a touch of makeup until I was 12 or 13, fwiw. Two little studs is not equivalent to "bling" in my opinion, and I don't see a problem with the piercing happening earlier than makeup.
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 5:03 pm
Posted by lsunurse
Member since Dec 2005
129071 posts
Posted on 3/22/14 at 5:03 pm to
Also if you wait until they are older you can make it a fun experience for them.

I still remember when I got mine (I was 6) and I got to pick out my earrings. I was so excited.
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 5:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram