quote:
But it was a very limited sample, 5% as I recall. That's not complete enough to evaluate how extensive the irregularities were. And it only included high schools. Plus I didn't read anything from the state's review that identified why the problems were occurring. What was the cause of the irregularities? Was it incompetence? Was it intentional fraud? I would like to know that.

My understanding was that the DOE audit was not intended to be the thorough audit to answer all of the questions, but simply to determine if something happened. In fact they turned the investigation over to the IG I thought in order to do a more thorough investigation and answer these questions of why.

While the investigation itself is not enough on its own to call for resignations, I think the reaction to it and Taylor's record of ineffectiveness here is more than enough. It's past time for him to go.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by LSURussian

Member since Feb 2005

126994 posts

Posted on 3/21/14 at 1:15 pm to BR Tiger

quote:
My understanding was that the DOE audit was not intended to be the thorough audit to answer all of the questions, but simply to determine if something happened.

Be careful....Poodlebrain is going to accuse you of questioning and finding fault with the state's review.

quote:
While the investigation itself is not enough on its own to call for resignations, I think the reaction to it and Taylor's record of ineffectiveness here is more than enough. It's past time for him to go.

If there is any evidence that Taylor played a part in the irregularities, I agree with you completely. But at least remember that he was not even in BR during the first two years the state's review covered. He was only hired in April, 2012. The review went back to 2010.

If he knew about the issues and did nothing during the two years he has been working at the school system, it should cost him his job.

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board