Started By
Message

re: Where we screwed up regarding Ukraine

Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:28 pm to
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127260 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

So we should be more concerned about the disenfranchisement of people across the globe, possibly using military force to protect them...

but don't seem to care about our own disenfranchisement in the USA, our own votes being canceled out by illegals etc that don't need voter ids.

A classic example of a false dichotomy.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

There was no language in the agreement which committed any of the three parties to defend or "protect" Ukraine's sovereignty.

Russia violated its pledge to "respect" Ukraine's territorial integrity.

The U.S. has not violated the agreement.


Which is exactly why Ukraine should have a nuclear arsenal returned to their country.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57508 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

A classic example of a false dichotomy.


It's only a false dichotomy in a vacuum. Ukraine isn't in a vacuum.

The question is, as posed by the "false" dichotomy, GIVEN the reality of our country's current status and our limited resources, what REAL justification would we have to consider aggressive unilateral actions and/or military force against another country (or multiple countries)?

Why is this having to be spelled out for you?
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

I still don't see how this is our problem


Really?

Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127260 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Why is this having to be spelled out for you?

Nothing has to be spelled out for me. It's you who is making silly and inappropriate analogies and making it sound like there is only one right way to view international issues.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57508 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Really?


Yeah really.

Let's say it's the worst case scenario and we HAVE to go to war over this, what then? Who are we fighting for?

Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Why is this having to be spelled out for you?


Eastern Ukraine is under threat.

Putin took Crimea out of a position of weakness. He could possibly try to take Eastern Ukraine or key cities because they need "protection".

Why is all this happening? Because the Moscow backed President was ousted and Ukraine wants to join NATO.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127260 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Who are we fighting for?
Who was the US fighting for when we entered the war in Europe in 1941? It was for us.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57508 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Nothing has to be spelled out for me. It's you who is making silly and inappropriate analogies and making it sound like there is only one right way to view international issues.


Taking care of our own country's issues first is a bad philosophy?

Is that silly?

Explain to me HOW we can REALLY help the Ukraine in the long run if our economy tanks in 20 years?

So, we step in for them now...get Russia even madder at us. We continue out of control domestic policies and become VERY vulnerable internationally down the road. Can we help the Ukraine then?

When does it stop?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125545 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

He could possibly try to take Eastern Ukraine or key cities because they need "protection".



Yup even thought two Ukrainians were killed by Pro Russian supporters the other day in Donetsk.

quote:

Because the Moscow backed President was ousted and Ukraine wants to join NATO.



Exactly what it all comes down to. The people had enough of the Russian puppet fricking up their country.

Also notice how Putin does this right after his "showcase" Olympics even though they were pretty much a fail.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Let's say it's the worst case scenario and we HAVE to go to war over this, what then? Who are we fighting for?


We supply the Ukrainians with weapons and start wars all over each front of Russia through the Chechnyans etct.

Saudi's have the means and resources to fund a insurgency inside Chechnya and Georgia.

We hit them with sanctions and start crippling their economy. Everyone acts as if we have no cards to play? They have economic pressure points just like everyone else.
This post was edited on 3/17/14 at 3:48 pm
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Who was the US fighting for when we entered the war in Europe in 1941? It was for us.


Our interest
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57508 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

We supply the Ukrainians with weapons and start wars all over each front of Russia through the Chechnyans etct.

Saudi's have the means and resources to fund a insurgency inside Chechnya.


That's fine. Let's do that.

But someone needs to get those clowns in DC to shut their mouths and do that on the down low.

Screaming red lines and upping the rhetoric is going to lead up to war.

Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127260 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

When does it stop?
I'll repeat Reagan's reply when he was asked that by the whiners and cry babies of his day, "We win, they lose."
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125545 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Saudi's have the means and resources to fund a insurgency inside Chechnya.



Getting it bed with Chechnya wont happen. Thats something us and the Russians agree on taking out.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57508 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

I'll repeat Reagan's reply when he was asked that by the whiners and cry babies of his day, "We win, they lose."



Reagan was president then. Not that poser we have now. Your response is invalid.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16864 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

So we should be more concerned about the disenfranchisement of people across the globe, possibly using military force to protect them


i didnt mention using military force, but the point is that Putins logic and path have a history of developing in to some of Europe's biggest wars. NOW is the time to interven to prevent it from becoming anything more than it is. With a global economy this interdependent, its possible if Europe is on board.

quote:

but don't seem to care about our own disenfranchisement in the USA, our own votes being canceled out by illegals etc that don't need voter ids.


yeah its a problem. doesnt mean you stick your head in the sand and forget about everything else going on.

quote:

We are concerned for their freedoms


its not about Ukraine as much as its about what Putin is doing, and how hes justfying it.

quote:

but sit idly by while our own rights are eroding away?


Jesus this could be another whole thread. If you dont like it here move.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

But someone needs to get those clowns in DC to shut their mouths and do that on the down low.

Screaming red lines and upping the rhetoric is going to lead up to war.


We make it clear to Putin Eastern Ukraine is off limits.

Still, you are right. Never show your escalation strategy when you are in a confrontation.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127260 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Your response is invalid.
Your response to my response is invalid.


:rimshot:
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:54 pm to
quote:


Taking care of our own country's issues first is a bad philosophy?

Is that silly?

Explain to me HOW we can REALLY help the Ukraine in the long run if our economy tanks in 20 years?


It's not silly, it makes great sense.

The problem is, and Russian knows this, that this is about the G7 economies vs the BRIC economies. Ukraine is a pivotal area and both want to control it, it's a great capture for the G7 both economically and militarily if we get Ukraine.

We are not a nation that can succeed independently. We've turned our currency into the global reserve, we've built an economy that relies on cooperation from countries around the globe, there's a lot more that can be said, but basically we can not just sit back and take care of our own backyard, we've installed a system that requires imperialist motives.
This post was edited on 3/17/14 at 3:56 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram