Started By
Message

re: Will The Gay Marriage Issue Result In Churches...

Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:05 pm to
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Besides, I asked about the "average" church. The examples you present are anything but average.


Why do you need these beautiful built and designed structures to worship god?

I have seen even the smallest churches just stocked full of decorations I can't think about affording.

Does god get upset if you gather your flock in a park under a tree?

Seems like a lot of church money could be better spent on the flock as opposed to all the trappings for the various religions. And be sure, all religions are guilty of this. They need to be taxed. There is nothing non-profit about any church in this country.
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Why do you need these beautiful built and designed structures to worship god?

I have seen even the smallest churches just stocked full of decorations I can't think about affording.

Does god get upset if you gather your flock in a park under a tree?

Seems like a lot of church money could be better spent on the flock as opposed to all the trappings for the various religions. And be sure, all religions are guilty of this. They need to be taxed. There is nothing non-profit about any church in this country.


My church collected about 1.06 million dollars in tithes/offerings this past fiscal year, and its budget was 1.15 million dollars, so it ran a loss.

The expenses are salaries for staff and maintanence, facilities upkeep, utilities, etc.

If you tax a church that means less money for its philanthropy and charity which is a major part of the budget

I understand what you are saying about how churches don't need to spend money on fancy displays and technology and equipment, I get it, but at the same time it helps attract non believers. Regulars are going to attend regardless, but the non believers and those who never attend church, you need to find ways to retain them and get them to come back
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99327 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Losing tax exempt status for failure to perform or recognize them?


Yep.

"By the authority vested in me by the State of _____"

Gays - this is a function of the state, the actor cannot discriminate

Church - 1st Amendment

Gays - we're gonna go whine and bitch about this and Uncle Obama's gonna take away tax exempt status.
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

My church collected about 1.06 million dollars in tithes/offerings this past fiscal year, and its budget was 1.15 million dollars, so it ran a loss.


Many a business runs at a loss. They still get taxed (and some go out of business).

quote:

Regulars are going to attend regardless, but the non believers and those who never attend church, you need to find ways to retain them and get them to come back


I get the whole witnessing of the Christian church, trying to preach to the non-believers and all that. But do churches get the bang for their buck? I have been to my share over the years and some of the crap they have to make church "entertaining" is beyond ridiculous. And while your church may be operating at a loss...you can be sure many do not. Some of the mormon churches in Arizona are scary in their structures and cost millions to build. To what end? Sure doesn't get anyone closer to god.

Tax em all.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

There is nothing non-profit about any church in this country.


Except you have yet to show you have any understanding of the word "profit". Most churches operate either at budget or at a loss.
Posted by TejasPete
Member since Dec 2013
1425 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:15 pm to
Hopefully so, 90% of churches are just in it for the money anyway.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134989 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:17 pm to
Yes, unless it's a Muslim church...they can do what they want because we're scared of them
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99327 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Yes, unless it's a Muslim church...they can do what they want because Obama's one of them


FIFY
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:27 pm to
Also, Churches aren't completely tax exempt.

The money they receive in the form of tithes or offerings are exempt.

Profits from business revenue such as any thing sold such as publications, music, building rental fees, and any profits from investments are still taxed.

Also the IRS is very hands off when it comes to churches and IRS auditors have to get special permission before starting an investigation of a church. Hence why there are a lot of "shady" ministries out there.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58252 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Losing tax exempt status for failure to perform or recognize them?



That will be the first thing they do.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58252 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Amen to those photos. Pardon me for waxing religious, but would Jesus even recognize the church of today?


Yes as Laodicean!
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:47 pm to
Churches shouldn't be tax exempt in the first place
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58252 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Hopefully so, 90% of churches are just in it for the money anyway.


It's super cool man when people make up numbers out of nowhere just for effect!
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 3:02 pm to
Who gives a shite whether a church recognizes your marriage as long as it's recognized by your government at tax time and the hospital recognizes you as next of kin.

And no, churches will not be forced to perform ceremonies that run counter to their beliefs. Ask a divorced catholic if you want to know more.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48785 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

Hopefully so, 90% of churches are just in it for the money anyway.


It always blows my mind how liberals like TejasPete and asurob are so against separation of church and state. I guess it just goes to show that hatred of religion blinds them from their normal espoused beliefs.
Posted by klrstix
Shreveport, LA
Member since Oct 2006
3217 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 3:12 pm to
quote:



asurob1

Many a business runs at a loss. They still get taxed (and some go out of business).


I hate to let facts get in the way of an argument, however, I have been in Accounting for 3 decades.. I have yet to see a business pay "Income" taxes on a loss....

Non Profits pay just about every tax any other business pays except for the "Income" tax....

Also... While I have not looked this up recently, I believe the average church in our country only has an attendance of 90 each week in their Sunday Morning service. Just for context...

Here is something regarding average church attendance with links referenced...

The median church in the U.S. has 75 regular participants in worship on Sunday mornings, according to the National Congregations Study (NCS) LINK / . Notice that researchers measured the median church size — the point at which half the churches are smaller and half the churches are larger — rather than the average (186 attenders reported by the USCLS survey LINK ), which is larger due to the influence of very large churches. But while the United States has a large number of very small churches, most people attend larger churches. The National Congregations Study estimated that the smaller churches draw only 11 percent of those who attend worship.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 3:17 pm
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
19068 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 3:21 pm to
I fully expect it, along with courts eventually ruling against a church who refuses to perform gay weddings, or denies a person a job because of their sexual preference.


Sad, sad times.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29446 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Seems like a lot of church money could be better spent on the flock as opposed to all the trappings for the various religions. And be sure, all religions are guilty of this. They need to be taxed. There is nothing non-profit about any church in this country.

Tell me, how many church budget meetings have you sat in on? Hmm?

I'll wait patiently for your answer.
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
2146 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:36 pm to
No.

The whole "issue" is a boogeyman.

Because of State Actor doctrine, Loving v. Virginia (which struck down state interracial marriage bans) did not affect freedom of churches to refuse to marry whomever they want. Many churches refuse to marry couples for various reasons (cohabitating before marriage, previously divorced, spouses of different religions, etc.) that the state doesn't care about, and some have still continued to refuse interracial marriages without losing tax exempt status.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 4:39 pm to
Serious question, has an all white church ever lost its tax exempt status from refusing to host an interracial or black couple's wedding? I seem to remember a Southern Baptist Church in Mississippi refusing to marry a black couple a few years ago.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram