Started By
Message

re: Natural Born Killers vs. True Romance

Posted on 1/8/14 at 9:54 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89696 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

It just comes across as being shocking for the sake of being shocking.


That's honestly all I took away from it at the time. True Romance has a bunch of different levels. How a movie can be filled with that much violence, and yet border on being both a drama and romantic comedy - all the while containing a scene where a 120 pound girl defeats Tony Soprano, the Sicilian scene - as well as Brad Pitt's "Floyd" (his finest character to date, IMHO) - and Oldman's "Drexyl" (sheer acting genius) - when you break True Romance down into the component parts - it just gets more and more awesome.

And I agree with this being the one we'll remember Slater for (at least positively) - more kudos for the late, great Tony Scott - Slater can barely act, yet Tony got his best performane out of him - and by a significant margin.

I haven't seen everything she's done, but Arquette has been "meh" ever since (didn't watch Medium - she gets rave reviews for that - and haven't seen her in Boardwalk Empire yet.)
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103246 posts
Posted on 1/8/14 at 10:02 am to
I think the performances by Bronson Pinchot and Saul Rubineck in True Romance really carry the last 1/3 of the movie. they were both absolutely incredible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram