Started By
Message

re: Twitter IPO

Posted on 11/8/13 at 10:58 am to
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50382 posts
Posted on 11/8/13 at 10:58 am to
They have 60% gross margins

Don't tell me that 100% of the cost of Sales, SGA, and R&D is related to growth.

My point is most companies, they make money selling goods or services at a certain margin then growth by selling more.

Twitter has to grow by figuring out how to make more money with the "assets"(users) it has. Yes they will grow their user base but it won't be anywhere in relation to what they need to grow their revenue and profits in relation to justify their 25 billion dollar market cap.

There users are already valued at higher than linkedin or facebook. So the market things there is more value there. I disagree.


I don't feel like what im saying, that tech ipo's are historically overvalued, is really out in left field.
This post was edited on 11/8/13 at 11:00 am
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 11/8/13 at 5:38 pm to
Nice 7.24% drop in price today.

Overnight millionaires dumping that crap.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28746 posts
Posted on 11/9/13 at 12:10 am to
quote:

They have 60% gross margins
Yeah, it helps to look at gross margins when valuing high growth tech companies, because profit margins can be misleading. When the cost of the "goods" is low, you can get a good idea for what the eventual profits might be.
quote:

Don't tell me that 100% of the cost of Sales, SGA, and R&D is related to growth

No, probably half of it is though, which would put Twitter's profits in the neighborhood of FB and GOOG's once the growth starts to slow down to their levels. The biggest question is what will Twitter's growth curve look like.
quote:

I don't feel like what im saying, that tech ipo's are historically overvalued, is really out in left field.
It's not out in left field, it is true, but the key word is "historically". The tech industry (and tech investors) have matured quite a bit over the last decade. The revenues are real, and the growth is real. But being "profitable" as such a young company isn't as big a concern as the "value investors" think it is. These companies don't have to figure out how to become profitable, they just have to decide when to become profitable.

That said, I have to agree that Twitter is probably overvalued by quite a bit at this point. I will have to watch it for another year or so to see if they maintain their revenue growth.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram