Started By
Message

re: O/U for Mark Ingram Yards vs. Buccaneers

Posted on 9/10/13 at 6:45 pm to
Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 6:45 pm to
4yds.
O tds
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112488 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 6:45 pm to
Ingram isnt that good and Tampas run D is beastly

O/U should be 15 yards
Posted by MISSIPSAINT
Magee
Member since Feb 2013
438 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 6:47 pm to
Under! Bucs run d is good. Did u see our run blocking against ATL. Gona take time for this zone run blocking scheme to gel.
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Did u see our run blocking against ATL

No.
Because there was none. We were the 9th worst run blocking team last week.
Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10403 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Somewhere around 60 yards (15-20 carries, 4 first downs, 1 TD).


The thought of Mark Ingram getting 20 carries makes me
Posted by CHEDBALLZ
South Central LA
Member since Dec 2009
22010 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 7:16 pm to
Mark Ingrams Yards After Contact will be under 2
Posted by jdrumdog
baton rouge, la
Member since Jan 2010
7655 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 7:28 pm to
Yeah, it's going to be under 50. 45 is my magic number for him.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56940 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

I'm going to set the O/U at 75 yards.

Posted by UAFanFromNOLA
NOLA
Member since Dec 2011
4882 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 8:05 pm to
I don't think he is ever going to have success in our offense since he is pretty much only in for running plays which makes it easier for the defense to zero in on him. If he isn't going to get a run of plays or even a series, he won't ever be successful and probably would be better off elsewhere. I want him here, but I don't see it working out at this point.
Posted by Unknown_Poster
Member since Jun 2013
5758 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

I don't think he is ever going to have success in our offense since he is pretty much only in for running plays which makes it easier for the defense to zero in on him. If he isn't going to get a run of plays or even a series, he won't ever be successful and probably would be better off elsewhere. I want him here, but I don't see it working out at this point.



That's it in a nutshell. My guess is that Payton saw Ingram and thought how great it would be to have an Adrian Peterson like back to pair with Drew Brees. Obviously Ingram is no Peterson but he'd still be a good back... in the right system. The Saints offense is centered around Brees so trying to squeeze a workhorse type back in there made no sense. Ingram will never flourish here.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 9:22 pm to
lol i was expecting the o/u to be set at 20 yards..
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112488 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 12:30 am to
quote:

That's it in a nutshell. My guess is that Payton saw Ingram and thought how great it would be to have an Adrian Peterson like back to pair with Drew Brees. Obviously Ingram is no Peterson but he'd still be a good back... in the right system. The Saints offense is centered around Brees so trying to squeeze a workhorse type back in there made no sense. Ingram will never flourish here.


Theres so much wrong in this
Posted by LSU Rules07
Member since Oct 2007
1253 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:29 am to
He had 9 carries for 11 yards week one. Let that sink in. I say way way under
Posted by ColaTiger
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
2193 posts
Posted on 9/11/13 at 7:37 am to
11 rushes 19 yards
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram