- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
![locked post](https://www.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/lock.gif)
.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:05 am
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:05 am
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 5:07 am
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:10 am to DelU249
Unfortunately he sits atop a gold mine...and he knows it.
You think his stupid actions have any adverse affect on ticket sales?
You think his stupid actions have any adverse affect on ticket sales?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:10 am to DelU249
He isn't rich because he gives money away. He'll fight for every dollar.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:16 am to DelU249
He's like IRL Forrest Gump, dumb and rich as frick
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:31 am to DelU249
quote:
Jerry Jones is borderline retarded
Meh, I'm torn here.
I dislike Jerry Jones but I abhore frivolous lawsuits. I think I'm siding with jurrah on this one.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:34 am to DelU249
frick Jerry Jones and his stadium
Maybe if he actually accomplished that 120k capacity goal people would have showed up with a seat. Maybe if season ticket holders weren't given all the tickets and dumping them on the secondary market it would be easier to know how many tickets you could actually sell and how many you need.
Maybe if he actually accomplished that 120k capacity goal people would have showed up with a seat. Maybe if season ticket holders weren't given all the tickets and dumping them on the secondary market it would be easier to know how many tickets you could actually sell and how many you need.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 11:40 am to DelU249
quote:
Lost in all of this is that people showed up for the Super Bowl with tickets and weren’t able to watch the game. While the plaintiffs shouldn’t be able to overreach in their efforts to be fairly compensated for the snafu, the fact remains that the premier sporting event in America suffered a complete failure on one of the most simple and linear propositions in all of business — buy a ticket for admission, gain admission
+ infinity
Posted on 7/26/13 at 2:33 pm to DelU249
quote:
it seems like a lot of you don’t understand what is going on here.
which is understandable, given the cloudy way this article was written.
The judge basically said “Dallas isnt liable in the class action suit. The fault lays at the hands of the NFL, theyre the ones who were in charge of all of this, the ones who made the mistakes.” Which is exactly what JJ said all along. I believe even the NFL said as much, but I could be mistaken in that. Its not like, just because its your stadium thats hosting the superbowl, you get to do what you want and make all decisions in regards to capacity/seating/etc. The NFL controls all of that.
The fans have every right to sue the NFL for the mixups. However, the fans got greedy, and in an effort to squueze everything they could out if the NFL, they sued everyone. The judge said “Dallas is exempt”.
Dallas said “hey, cool. but since these greedy people caused us a lot of time and almost $200,000 in legal fees, we’re trying to recapture this.”
Imagine if you owned a restaurant, that took part in a community event, say a fundraiser for charity. The charity says “make 50,000 hamburgers bc we estimate everyone will have two burgers”. So you do. And then the charity sold more tickets than actaual hamburgers exist. Its not your fault, the charity said do X, then the charity does Y.
People sue, the charity tries to make good, but the people say, this isnt enough. Eff it, were suing everyone involved, even the food vendor.
The judge says, BS, the vendor followed direction from the charity, the charity is at fault, NOT the vendor.
Would you at that point say “hey. screw it. All the time and money I wasted on my defense, I’m just glad I spent 200,000 instead of 10 million. boy am I lucky!”
Hell no. You go after the people who wasted your time and money.
That being said, its still not the best move on Dallas’ part.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 2:58 pm to DelU249
I would be going after that money, too. That is an absolutely obscene amount of money to have to spend to produce documents during discovery.
Not his fault that they didn't get their class certified and the Customers sued the Cowboys, which was probably the wrong entity to sue and had nothing to do with the claim in the first place. frick that. If I were the Cowboys' lawyer, I'd do the same damn thing. The customers' lawyers shouldn't have dropped the goddamn ball on joining the Cowboys to the suit.
Not his fault that they didn't get their class certified and the Customers sued the Cowboys, which was probably the wrong entity to sue and had nothing to do with the claim in the first place. frick that. If I were the Cowboys' lawyer, I'd do the same damn thing. The customers' lawyers shouldn't have dropped the goddamn ball on joining the Cowboys to the suit.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)