Started By
Message

re: Blue vs Hill

Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:08 pm to
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164533 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Both backs are good, maybe even great. Blue is as complete a back as we have had.

I don't understand how people can make this assessment from two games. He showed a ton of potential..

Blue is much more a flavor of the month than Hill is.. As PomPom incorrectly brought up.
Posted by Mitchell613
Lyon, France
Member since May 2008
890 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

I don't understand how people can make this assessment from two games. He showed a ton of potential..

Blue is much more a flavor of the month than Hill is.. As PomPom incorrectly brought up.



Blue has only played two games?
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16324 posts
Posted on 7/10/13 at 12:13 pm to
Dude if you read my entire post you will see that I think Hill is better.

And he is a very complete back. Not just back, football player. And its an assessment made over more than just last year. He was a special team stud early on in his career. Practice and spring games and during games he showed he can catch the ball out the backfield very well. Also great pass blocker. Dude is a complete player for us and has done it all in his 3 years playing.

But please read my entire post. I think Hill is better than Blue. Just think Blue brings a little bit of everything to the table. While Hill is a work horse that gets better later as the game goes on and is a monster. Both are very very good.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram