- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GV market value?
Posted on 6/29/13 at 1:11 pm to Hullabaloo
Posted on 6/29/13 at 1:11 pm to Hullabaloo
We'd need to include more salary than that. Looks to me like we'd have to do Lopez + Vasquez, which I wouldn't do.
2
Posted on 6/29/13 at 1:16 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
We'd need to include more salary than that. Looks to me like we'd have to do Lopez + Vasquez, which I wouldn't do.
Yeah, definitely don't want to give up both, especially for Granger.
quote:
If Vasquez is better than George Hill, it's marginal at best.
Hill is a good bench shooter but couldn't even get over 5 assists a game on that talented roster. I'd think Vasquez would be a better starter.
This post was edited on 6/29/13 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 6/29/13 at 1:48 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
Looks to me like we'd have to do Lopez + Vasquez, which I wouldn't do.
Seriously? I'd deal those two for Granger in a heartbeat.
Granger's injury problems are severely overstated. A lot of players who play significant minutes has injury problems. Look at guys like Kobe, Wade, Deng (who everyone wants), Paul, Rose, Parker, Melo etc. Does everyone realize these guys miss time every year due to injury?
Granger would be a huge get and it would be a discount to get him for only GV and Lopez. Now, if his knee turns out to be a long term deal, you leave him alone.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News