Started By
Message
locked post

New Computer Build

Posted on 6/26/13 at 12:21 am
Posted by Damaged Goods
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2013
15 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 12:21 am
Thinking about a Sager NP9390-S and looking for a little input? Will this setup be able to handle most games?

Display 17.3" Full HD LED-Backlit Display featuring 90% NTSC Color Gamut in Super Glossy
Surface (1920 x 1080)

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M GPU with 4GB GDDR5 Video Memory

CPU Processor 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i7-4900MQ Processor ( 8MB L3 Cache, 2.80GHz)

Operating System Genuine MS Windows® 7 Ultimate

Memory 16GB Dual Channel DDR3 SDRAM at 1600MHz - 2 X 8GB

mSATA SSD Drive Slot 1 Crucial 256GB M4 Series mSATA SSD - as an OS Drive (Primary Drive C) -

Hard Disk Drive 1 240GB Crucial M5 Series SATA3 Solid State Disk Drive

Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
45716 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 1:02 am to
Beastly mobile gfx card and processor for sure

Limited on disk space though. Maybe make the slave hd non ssd if a 500gb aint enough
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 1:25 am to
Okay, I went to the site and configured it. If you're buying this, I am assuming you have tons of money to throw around and don't really care about shopping around or price. You've configured an extremely fast machine priced at just over $3,000.

But, in case you are, I'll at least give you some tips on the configuration. If you're truly interested in maximizing bang for buck, we can discuss other brands. But let's go with this for now.

Save $370 by going with the i7-4700MQ. No-brainer. This is a gaming laptop, and you will not notice one ioda of a difference in performance with the 2 extra MB of L3 cache and a 400MHz bump.

Next, and this is simply what I'd do because I don't like to pay for operating systems, pirate Windows 7 ultimate. They are charging $125 extra just for you to move from Win 8 to Win 7 ultimate. I'd never pay that. But if you'd rather go the honorable route (lame), you can get it on eBay and elsewhere for under $100. Of course, ask yourself exactly what you want out of Windows 7 Ultimate that Windows 8 won't give you. (I'm not saying you don't have an answer. Just want you to be sure it's worth it if you don't want to pirate it).

Finally, nix the other SSD and stick with default 750GB hard drive and save $160. SSD performance shines as a boot drive. Unless you're doing daily massive (I mean massive) file transfers between drives, you're wasting your money on less storage.

So, with those three tweaks, you knock off $655 and lose no significant gaming performance.


Will it be able to handle most games? Of course, and at very high/ultra settings in a lot of games.

Also, I assume mobility is important (I know some of the gaming folks here work offshore or travel a lot for work and whatnot, so a gaming laptop makes a lot of sense). Otherwise, that $3k could get you an orgasmic 1440p gaming desktop setup that would rival the top builds among the GB posters (Except Coyote's).
This post was edited on 6/26/13 at 1:31 am
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:38 am to
What he said
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
42123 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:50 am to
IMO, I would go with Samsung SSD.
Posted by HamCandy
Team Meat
Member since Dec 2008
923 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:51 am to
Do think its worth the money to get a laptop with the 120hz refresh rate? I've seen the option on a few brands, looks like they are charging out the arse for it.
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:57 am to
You can get the 250 gb samsung 840 ssd for about $170. I'm tempted to pick one up for my laptop.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
179645 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:58 am to
You can get gaming laptops for half that price that will run everything you would ever want to play.

For example

Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor
8 GB DDR3
1024 GB Hard Drive
17.3-Inch Screen
NV GTX670MX w/ 3GB GDDR5
Windows 8

Price: $1,680.00

LINK

A lot of what you have on that other build is overkill. You don't need 16GB or ram for gaming and I doubt you ever use all 4GB of vram on that card at 1080p. Not enough to notice a huge difference anyway unless that monitor will do more than 60Hz. Like ILikeLSUToo said the SSD will only serve you on bootup and large file transfers. If you had a desktop with drive bays to spare that would be one thing otherwise I would maximize my storage with an HDD.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
179645 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Do think its worth the money to get a laptop with the 120hz refresh rate?


Man, I don't know. I know games at 60FPS feel smoother but at some point above that you have to think about diminishing returns when you throw in that the human eye can't see more than 30fps.
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:08 am to
People who play at 120 swear by it but what you don't know won't hurt you also.
This post was edited on 6/26/13 at 9:09 am
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
179645 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:15 am to
I would have to see it to believe it. I would rather have a higher def like 1440p vs higher FPS that the human eye can't even pick up.

I know why higher FPS are needed in games vs films but I just don't know how much of a difference it would make. I guess the biggest benefit would be that you may not need motion blurring at 120Hz.
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 10:30 am to
I'm trying to find the article but I read a while back about how the human eye can only pick up so much is a myth. I'll edit when I find it.

eta: Having trouble finding it but the basic concept I am getting from searching is that it just isn't that simple. The eye doesn't see in frames per second in the real world so it just doesn't work that way. Also the way you perceive a static picture flashing like your desktop vs movement is different. I can tell for sure when playing games at 30 vs 60 and what people always say about 120 is the feel is just different, whatever that means.
This post was edited on 6/26/13 at 10:52 am
Posted by WestlakeTiger
San Antonio, Tejas
Member since Feb 2012
9488 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 11:09 am to
the only thing I can say is there is a drastic difference when I watch football on 60hz-120hz.

and 240 is just silly. so smooth. so im not sure about the fps thing. I'll do some research too gardoki
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 11:25 am to
tv refresh rates are in their own world too because sports aren't even shot in frames that high. You would think it would all be the same but they all do different things and different tv's use different technologies to make the in between frames so to speak
Posted by WestlakeTiger
San Antonio, Tejas
Member since Feb 2012
9488 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 11:34 am to
well crap. you see. I didn't know that either.
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 11:35 am to
Yea there is a lot of bs out there. I read up on that too one time but I don't remember the details.
Posted by bluebarracuda
Member since Oct 2011
19157 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 12:32 pm to
Plus TVs arent true 120hz/240hz like they say. I don't remember the name, but they use some software to "constructs" a frame inbetween two frames. 120hz monitors are true 120hz though

Eta: I'm pretty sure its called interpolation
This post was edited on 6/26/13 at 12:33 pm
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 12:42 pm to
It's interpolation but different tv manufacturers do it differently.
Posted by bluebarracuda
Member since Oct 2011
19157 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 1:51 pm to
But it's all the same concept. Unless you buy a $1000+ TV, most manufacturers do it almost the same.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 3:02 pm to
Yeah they have different names for it "Clear Frame" or "Smooth Frame" etc. I have a 120Hz tv and I turn that shite off. Doesn't look natural to me. Gaming at 120Hz is a whole different experience, though. However, between 1440p and 120Hz, I choose 1440p if I can't have both.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram