Started By
Message

re: CPM's Lack of Strategic Coaching

Posted on 6/19/13 at 7:26 am to
Posted by JustSmokin
Member since Sep 2007
9151 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 7:26 am to
Doesn't really matter about strategy when you got players who can't come through in the clutch. 13 players left on base. That's more than enough opportunities to win the game.

Guess it's easier to hit when nobody is on base. The clutch gene is missing for some of these guys.
Posted by markthetiger
alexandria
Member since Aug 2005
945 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 7:39 am to
Why do all the teams i have watched in the CWS bunt and get runners over 100% of the time. When someone questions why we don't do it or questions what our coach's plan is, some of us question the loyalty of the person asking the question and jumps on them like sharks in a feeding frenzy. The dude that hit the homeroom on us earlier in the game, bunted later in the game to get that valuable insurance run. We have guys who went 0 for Omaha and they are just wailing away at the plate swinging at everything with a runner on first. Some people simply ask why this occurs.
Posted by vjp819
South Sec. 414 / Alex Box Sec. 210
Member since Nov 2003
10882 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 7:47 am to
in the UCLA gameplan it's not a tough decision to bunt players when your top player is hitting .279. they know they don't get many hits, so when they get someone on base the best chance of scoring is getting him in position to score in the event they get that one hit. i would be bored as hell having to sit through a season of that. on second thought i probably wouldn't even go to watch.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram