- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Goodell defends Redskins name
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:50 am to SabiDojo
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:50 am to SabiDojo
quote:so lau should drop the live mike the tiger because a few animal rights folks are offended by him?
Other Native Americans are offended by it, and that to me is good enough reason to change it. It's not right to tell them to "Suck it Up" or "Stop being so Sensitive" when it is clearly understandable why they are offended by it.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 9:05 am to Pedro
The Redskins are not located in D.C. so that city has no power to make Synder do anything, let alone move the team. And he has consistently been clear: he will NEVER change the name. I am a dyed in the wool Irishman, and my family, going back to those fresh off the boats in N.Y., had a hell of a lot more to worry about & struggle over than being called a Mick and/or mocked by all the typical sterotypes of Irishmen. Point being, American Natives have a lot more to worry about than a name of a pro football team in my very Irish opinion.
Posted on 6/13/13 at 11:48 am to Pedro
Mike The Tiger is a totally different situation. There really is no reason to be offended by a Tiger living in a multi-million dollar facility with some of the best veterinary care in the country.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)