- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Own vs Lease
Posted on 4/20/13 at 6:22 pm to TthomasJR
Posted on 4/20/13 at 6:22 pm to TthomasJR
I'm a big fan of leasing in the right situations. There's a few "prerequisites" to make leasing worthwhile. However, if you fit into these requirements, leasing can actually be more advantageous than buying. The requirements are that you want to own a new car often (desirable lease term, usually 2-4 years), can drive under the allotted mileage (10k-15k/year), do not want to modify or alter the car, and take generally good care of the vehicle. You want to make sure you fully understand the calculations involved in leasing so as to not get confused during negotiations. In general, leasing to buying the same vehicle is not better than buying outright from the beginning.
As far as using the dealer incentives, every dealer/manufacturer I've worked with has been able to apply the incentive money factor (lease "interest rate") and residual, regardless of which trim or options I choose (Toyota does calculate residual value different from most manufacturers).
I've made a simple spreadsheet to compare the total amount "invested" over the lease term in comparison to buying over the same term (assumption is you trade/sell vehicle at same time either option). From the vehicles I've compared, the lease option with manufacturer incentives can often be advantageous to buying.
Screenshot from actual Acura negotiations:
I've used this before, and it makes sense to me. It's possible that something may be missed, so I'm open to any comments.
As far as using the dealer incentives, every dealer/manufacturer I've worked with has been able to apply the incentive money factor (lease "interest rate") and residual, regardless of which trim or options I choose (Toyota does calculate residual value different from most manufacturers).
I've made a simple spreadsheet to compare the total amount "invested" over the lease term in comparison to buying over the same term (assumption is you trade/sell vehicle at same time either option). From the vehicles I've compared, the lease option with manufacturer incentives can often be advantageous to buying.
Screenshot from actual Acura negotiations:
I've used this before, and it makes sense to me. It's possible that something may be missed, so I'm open to any comments.
Posted on 4/21/13 at 1:36 am to LSUtigerME
According to this spreadsheet, the cost of either choice for three years is about 25K. Plus financing, of course. For that price you could buy 2-3 perfectly good used vehicles, drive them for three years, and then blow them up.
If you are willing to burn that much money that's your decision but if so there is little point in worrying about saving $3K on a lease vs. buy decision.
If you are willing to burn that much money that's your decision but if so there is little point in worrying about saving $3K on a lease vs. buy decision.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News