Started By
Message

re: Dell Demps

Posted on 4/16/13 at 10:25 am to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9869 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 10:25 am to
quote:

1) Wanting to keep Okafor/Ariza should get you banned. Let's pay an aging, average, unathletic C 14mil and a SF that can't even see court time for the WASHINGTON WIZARDS 7mil


I love that some guy that has been on the site for a couple of days is calling for people to be banned cause he doesn't agree with them. Not sure reading a forum is going to be much fun for him.

Let me reset this so everybody might understand where I am coming from. The highest paid player on the team this year didn't play a minute for the Hornets. Neither did the 6th highest paid player. The Hornets paid 17m to guys that didn't play for them at all. Me proposing that I'd have rather have used that money on guys that actually play on the team just makes sense to me.

The future obligations are worrisome, but now they are trade bait, same as last year. Except now they are expiring trade bait. There is already talk of a Okafor for Stoudamire trade in the works. shite moves on..
Posted by ShamelessPel
Metairie
Member since Apr 2013
12727 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 10:33 am to
quote:

I love that some guy that has been on the site for a couple of days is calling for people to be banned cause he doesn't agree with them. Not sure reading a forum is going to be much fun for him.


Haven't been on the site for a couple days, finally signed up after 3 years and somehow you seem to disagree with everything I say. We're gonna get along great.

quote:

The future obligations are worrisome, but now they are trade bait, same as last year. Except now they are expiring trade bait. There is already talk of a Okafor for Stoudamire trade in the works. shite moves on..


Woah you mean we could be getting AMARE STOUDEMIRE if we held on to Emeka Okafor? DAMNIT DAMNIT DAMNIT DELL. A $20mil/yr contract that's uninsured and pretty much the most un-tradeable contract in the league. Of course the Wizards want it you moron. They wanted Okafor/Ariza after all.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61670 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Me proposing that I'd have rather have used that money on guys that actually play on the team just makes sense to me.


I don't understand why so many people wanted to be mediocre this season. It'd have been one thing if Gordon was a stud and lead us to the playoff bubble, but since that didn't happen this team clearly needs more assets which it wouldn't get by winning more games and having its cap space still being taken up by Ariza and Okafor.

quote:

There is already talk of a Okafor for Stoudamire


You're saying this like it's a good thing.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96897 posts
Posted on 4/16/13 at 10:56 am to
quote:

The future obligations are worrisome, but now they are trade bait, same as last year. Except now they are expiring trade bait. There is already talk of a Okafor for Stoudamire trade in the works. shite moves on.


They're only trade bait if someone gives you a worthwhile offer.


Look at the kinds of offers we were getting for Kaman, Landry, and others last year as an example of the kind of lowball bullshite we were dealing with.

Detroit was expecting us to trade them Kaman and Landry for Charlie V's shite deal and 1-2 other bad contracts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram