- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Game of Thrones Season 3 Episode 2: Dark Wings, Dark Words - NO SPOILERS thread
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:34 am to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:34 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Of course I don't get why non-readers can't just RA the comments that they don't want here and continue the discussion of the show, ignoring those they don't want to address. Because frankly, you all don't "own" the thread and that's how it's being treated. If certain posters are a problem then address that with the admins.
So basically, you expect us to tiptoe through our own thread and then we read a spoiler, RA it. Or you want us to make sure to read who the poster is before reading every comment so that we don't read the potential spoiler. Sounds like a fun thread for us!
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:36 am to manwich
quote:
it's a no spoiler thread, not a no reader thread. it was starter by a reader.
Really? I understand there is a point to argue here but come on....it's pretty clear this is a thread for show watchers only since there is a thread 100% exclusive to book readers...
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:38 am to iluvdatiger
And let me clarify....no one has posted a spoiler in this thread. But, aside from that notion, yes...she wants watchers to skate on thin ice in their own thread just because some book readers can't resist the urge to post in this thread.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:39 am to Gugich22
quote:nope. i'm sorry you assumed some ignant shite
it's pretty clear this is a thread for show watchers only
now maybe you can stop crying
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:39 am to iluvdatiger
quote:what?
our own thread
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:41 am to manwich
is this really going to continue through today?
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:42 am to iluvdatiger
quote:
So basically, you expect us to tiptoe through our own thread and then we read a spoiler, RA it. Or you want us to make sure to read who the poster is before reading every comment so that we don't read the potential spoiler. Sounds like a fun thread for us!
Not what I said at all. I'm just saying exercise some common sense instead of derailing the thread with the bitching about book info/spoilers and claiming ownership over a thread you didn't even start. If it's a certain group of posters that you feel are doing it and ruining for everyone then email an admin. Or RA. No different then any other thread on any TD board.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:42 am to Salmon
apparently so
This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 8:43 am
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:45 am to Salmon
quote:
is this really going to continue through today?
I can only hope. This is entertaining.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:46 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:this has all been covered ad nauseum
I'm just saying exercise some common sense instead of derailing the thread with the bitching about book info/spoilers and claiming ownership over a thread you didn't even start. If it's a certain group of posters that you feel are doing it and ruining for everyone then email an admin. Or RA. No different then any other thread on any TD board.
they want to kick you out of a thread they have no ownership of because a few idiots thought they were being funny. you don't want to leave and you want them to know why. they don't care. blah blah blah. so instead of everyone just moving on, we rehash it over and over again.
This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 8:47 am
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:48 am to manwich
quote:
they want to kick you out of a thread they have no ownership of because a few idiots thought they were being funny
It's their thread, bro. Deal with it.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:55 am to manwich
I just want to see the chick fight.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 8:59 am to F machine
my brain says Bell but my heart says iluv
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:00 am to manwich
I'm going with Bell. She seems cool and calculating, but I bet she will frick some shite up if you piss her off. SHE JUST WANTS TO TALK ABOUT GAME OF THRONES!!! GEEZ!!
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:00 am to Salmon
quote:
is this really going to continue through today?
I glanced at page 25 yesterday to see everyone bickering about who may or may not have posted a spoiler and was hoping that today at page 38 we may have gotten past that point but clearly I had false hopes. Thread has gone to shite.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:02 am to F machine
quote:
SHE JUST WANTS TO TALK ABOUT GAME OF THRONES!!! GEEZ!!
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:09 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Not what I said at all
It's exactly what you said:
quote:
Of course I don't get why non-readers can't just RA the comments that they don't want here and continue the discussion of the show, ignoring those they don't want to address.
You're saying we should RA comments from readers that shouldn't be here. Either that or ignore them.
quote:
As said earlier by one of the other posters, some of us like to discuss the show with those who haven't read the books and the book reader threads tend to veer off more into the books then discussion of the actual show.
So discuss the episode there then, and keep the discussion on track. That's what that thread is for: episode discussion for people who read the books. Don't y'all fall into the category of "people who've read the books discussing the episode"? Of course you do. So why do y'all feel the need to come into this thread for discussion that goes elsewhere? That doesn't make any sense.
quote:
Because frankly, you all don't "own" the thread and that's how it's being treated. If certain posters are a problem then address that with the admins
That's your reasoning...that nobody "owns the thread"? You guys can say all you want that "this isn't for non readers, it's for no spoilers," but y'all know that's bullshite (and let's not pretend that we wouldn't be having the same arguments even if it said "no book people," as history had shown us time and time again). This thread was started in contrast to the book thread. Just like every other episode. But instead of appreciating that, you're arguing that y'all should basically post whatever you want in here and the rest of us should just ignore it or RA, and frick us if we don't agree because "nobody owns this thread." Amazing. By that logic, why even have thread titles? Nobody "owns" any of these threads, so every one should be fair game to talk about any and everything.
And your other suggestion is to get admins involved. Well IMO it shouldn't come to that. We should be able to handle this as adults, but y'all can't keep yourselves from posting in here instead of the thread that is created for you guys...and then bitch at us for "crying" about it, when you choose to ignore that you're causing the problems to begin with. Are any of you saying that if we have a "no readers" thread next week that you'd actually stay out of it? Because nobody in here actually believes that bullshite.
Posted on 4/9/13 at 9:12 am to Salmon
quote:
is this really going to continue through today?
Might as well. Readers and non readers obviously can't discuss things nicely (or evenly because of the knowledge base), and the thread has gone to shite. So why not?
Plus, it kills time anyway.
And fwiw, I'm not mad at anybody in here; I just don't see how people don't understand simple shite, and love to argue/discuss.
This post was edited on 4/9/13 at 9:14 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News