Started By
Message

re: Godzilla (2014) Cast

Posted on 3/20/13 at 10:20 am to
Posted by 7thWardTiger
Richmond, Texas
Member since Nov 2009
24670 posts
Posted on 3/20/13 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Exactly. I remember a lot of people bitching about how it didn't look like the old Godzilla and me thinking "well no shite, I'd hope not since the old Gojira was a man in a shitty, ugly rubber monster suit." I mean shite, it was 1998 and CGI/SFX were taking off that decade, so how can you bitch about a giant lizard monster that looked fine/real enough??


That wasn't Godzilla. Godzilla was a dinosaur born from nuclear tests over an island in the south Pacific Ocean. Godzilla was a giant, indestructible monster with a hankering for nuclear material to feed off.

Godzilla was the king of all monsters. Japan's unwanted but needed savior. Godzilla never just showed up to frick shite up. He came because he sensed the presence of other monsters. Godzilla was a protagonist and hero, not some suped up iguana that ran around NYC like a bitch.

That 1998 abortion was no Godzilla film. A Godzilla film has the real Godzilla, a pro and antagonist, and most importantly of all, radiation breath.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37412 posts
Posted on 3/20/13 at 10:28 am to
quote:

That wasn't Godzilla. Godzilla was a dinosaur born from nuclear tests over an island in the south Pacific Ocean. Godzilla was a giant, indestructible monster with a hankering for nuclear material to feed off.


Yes.

quote:

Godzilla was the king of all monsters. Japan's unwanted but needed savior. Godzilla never just showed up to frick shite up. He came because he sensed the presence of other monsters. Godzilla was a protagonist and hero, not some suped up iguana that ran around NYC like a bitch.


He did so in the very first film. That's all he was and all the 98 version was giving a nod towards.

He only became a hero later, let's not paint him as such when the purpose of the 1998 film was to remake Godzilla 1954 in the US (which, yes, lost all of the nuclear context). It took at least 5 films for Godzilla to be a "hero."

quote:

That 1998 abortion was no Godzilla film.


Debatable, depending on your context. It wasn't a sequel, or prequel, it wasn't even a remake.

quote:

A Godzilla film has the real Godzilla, a pro and antagonist,


Eh, it takes more than one film to do this anyway.

quote:

most importantly of all, radiation breath.


True.

Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52605 posts
Posted on 3/20/13 at 10:31 am to
quote:

That 1998 abortion was no Godzilla film.
that's how i feel about the new Evil Dead movie. the name is only there for ticket sales


ETA: to be fair, had they named it anything else people would be calling it a Godzilla ripoff
This post was edited on 3/20/13 at 10:33 am
Posted by lsufan112001
sportsmans paradise
Member since Oct 2006
10722 posts
Posted on 3/20/13 at 7:21 pm to
That wasn't Godzilla. Godzilla was a dinosaur born from nuclear tests over an island in the south Pacific Ocean. Godzilla was a giant, indestructible monster with a hankering for nuclear material to feed off.

Godzilla was the king of all monsters. Japan's unwanted but needed savior. Godzilla never just showed up to frick shite up. He came because he sensed the presence of other monsters. Godzilla was a protagonist and hero, not some suped up iguana that ran around NYC like a bitch.

That 1998 abortion was no Godzilla film. A Godzilla film has the real Godzilla, a pro and antagonist, and most importantly of all, radiation breath.

_____________________________

the truth here will set you free.

i liked the 1998 special effects, the story line sucked.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram