- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: F-U Pat Yasinkas
Posted on 3/2/13 at 4:56 pm to lsutigers1992
Posted on 3/2/13 at 4:56 pm to lsutigers1992
I said this a while back on this board and got killed lol. The things you quoted there are true. People assumed because Tagliabue dropped the player punishments, this meant they were innocent. That's just not what happened at all.
He's also right that the punishment had more to do with lying and covering things up than the bounties themselves. This has all been known from the beginning.
Bring the heat y'all, I can take it.
He's also right that the punishment had more to do with lying and covering things up than the bounties themselves. This has all been known from the beginning.
Bring the heat y'all, I can take it.
4
Posted on 3/2/13 at 4:58 pm to landrywasbeast30
quote:
He's also right that the punishment had more to do with lying and covering things up than the bounties themselves. This has all been known from the beginning.
Then why did they punish Fujita, who was here for one GW season before leaving for the Browns?
Posted on 3/2/13 at 4:59 pm to landrywasbeast30
Tagliabue vacated the punishments because he saw it for what it was -- a blatant attempt to make the Saints scapegoats for what was common practice in the NFL.
Posted on 3/2/13 at 5:10 pm to landrywasbeast30
quote:
Bring the heat y'all, I can take it.
We know...you say this fairly often.
Posted on 3/2/13 at 7:48 pm to landrywasbeast30
quote:
He's also right that the punishment had more to do with lying and covering things up than the bounties themselves. This has all been known from the beginning.
what evidence do you have that the saints lied and covered up things after the fact? The NFL stopped the allegations against the players and focuses on just the 2009 season
quote:
People assumed because Tagliabue dropped the player punishments, this meant they were innocent. That's just not what happened at all.
while true, Tags was a completely biased source on this matter. It wasn't like he was a neutral arbitrator
quote:
Pretty sure just the act of paying players under the table is in itself illegal. That's another thing some people don't get. And I know it wasn't pay for injury
not sure what we are arguing about then. While pay for performance may be illegal, that is not why the Saints go bent over. Many teams have ran pay for performance systems, and Tags actually defended pay for performances not too long ago
This post was edited on 3/2/13 at 7:49 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News