- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anthony Davis' PER
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:22 pm to Jester
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:22 pm to Jester
bynum is basically as good as a traditional center can be in the neo-NBA
when he's healthy basically the only thing that's wrong with him is he could improve his FT% (which was right under 70 and not bad for a traditional 5)
when he's healthy basically the only thing that's wrong with him is he could improve his FT% (which was right under 70 and not bad for a traditional 5)
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
bynum is basically as good as a traditional center can be in the neo-NBA
quote:
when he's healthy
i think the biggest problem is his ability to stay healthy...if he could have a 5 year span of putting up the numbers he's capable of without people having to worry "when is he going down next?"...then you have a superstar on your hands. right now, he's more of a distraction.
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
when he's healthy basically the only thing that's wrong with him is he could improve his FT% (which was right under 70 and not bad for a traditional 5)
And the maturity of a 7 year old doesn't help him, either.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)