Started By
Message

re: Anthony Davis' PER

Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:22 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:22 pm to
bynum is basically as good as a traditional center can be in the neo-NBA

when he's healthy basically the only thing that's wrong with him is he could improve his FT% (which was right under 70 and not bad for a traditional 5)
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40932 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

bynum is basically as good as a traditional center can be in the neo-NBA


quote:

when he's healthy


i think the biggest problem is his ability to stay healthy...if he could have a 5 year span of putting up the numbers he's capable of without people having to worry "when is he going down next?"...then you have a superstar on your hands. right now, he's more of a distraction.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34517 posts
Posted on 2/7/13 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

when he's healthy basically the only thing that's wrong with him is he could improve his FT% (which was right under 70 and not bad for a traditional 5)


And the maturity of a 7 year old doesn't help him, either.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram